The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
-
Implants subsidence is a frequent complication of interbody fusion, which can result in pain, deformity, nerve damage, and even failure of surgery. The end plates as the interface between implants and the vertebral bodies play a very important role in sharing the compression on the vertebral bodies. The information on the structural property distribution of the end plate and its relationship with bone mineral density (BMD) and disc degeneration will be of great significance for the reduction in implants subsidence and improvement in related operative procedures to increase the success rate of interbody fusion. ⋯ Preoperative evaluation of the states of intervertebral discs and BMD of patients is necessary for predicting risks of implants subsidence after interbody fusion. For patients with or without disc degeneration or osteoporosis, the implants should be placed at the peripheral regions, especially the posterolateral sites, to acquire higher mechanical strength to reduce subsidence as much as possible.
-
Comment
Commentary: revision lumbar surgery and revisiting the role of preoperative depression screening.
Adogwa O, Parker SL, Shau DN, et al. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis. Spine J 2012;12:179-85 (in this issue).
-
Lee MJ, Konodi MA, Cizik AM, et al. Risk factors for medical complication after spine surgery: a multivariate analysis of 1,591 patients. Spine J 2012;12:197-206 (in this issue).
-
Comparative Study
Quantification of walking ability in subjects with neurogenic claudication from lumbar spinal stenosis--a comparative study.
Walking limitations caused by neurogenic claudication (NC) are typically assessed with self-reported measures, although objective evaluation of walking using motorized treadmill test (MTT) or self-paced walking test (SPWT) has periodically appeared in the lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) literature. ⋯ Both MTT and SPWT can quantify walking abilities in NC. As outcome tools, SPWT demonstrated better internal responsiveness than MTT, but neither test demonstrated adequate external responsiveness. Neither test should be considered as a meaningful substitution for disease-specific measures of function.
-
Incidental durotomy during spine surgery is a common occurrence, with a reported incidence ranging from 3% to 16%. Risk factors identified by prior studies include age, type of procedure, revision surgery, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, gender, osteoporosis, and arthritis. However, these studies are largely univariate analyses using retrospectively recorded data. ⋯ Revision surgery, age, lumbar surgery, degenerative disease, and elevated surgical invasiveness are significant risk factors for unintended durotomy during spine surgery. These data can be useful to surgeons and patients when considering surgical treatment.