Articles: mechanical-ventilation.
-
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. · Jun 2023
Ventilator-induced Lung Injury Is Modulated by the Circadian Clock.
Rationale: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is life-saving but may evoke ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Objectives: To explore how the circadian clock modulates severity of murine VILI via the core clock component BMAL1 (basic helix-loop-helix ARNT like 1) in myeloid cells. Methods: Myeloid cell BMAL1-deficient (LysM (lysozyme 2 promoter/enhancer driving cre recombinase expression)Bmal1-/-) or wild-type control (LysMBmal1+/+) mice were subjected to 4 hours MV (34 ml/kg body weight) to induce lung injury. ⋯ Conclusions: Inflammatory response and lung barrier dysfunction upon MV exhibit diurnal variations, regulated by the circadian clock. LysMBmal1-/- mice are less susceptible to ventilation-induced pathology and lack circadian variation of severity compared with LysMBmal1+/+ mice. Our data suggest that the internal clock in myeloid cells is an important modulator of VILI.
-
Respiratory distress due to lower respiratory illnesses is a leading cause of death in children. Early recognition of high-risk populations is critical for the allocation of adequate resources. Our goal was to assess whether the lung ultrasound (US) score obtained at admission in children with respiratory distress predicts the need for escalated care. ⋯ An elevated lung US score measured in the first assessment of children with any type of respiratory distress was predictive of severity as defined by the need for escalated care with HFNC, NIV, or mechanical ventilation.
-
Analysis of observational data suggests that both a T-piece and zero pressure support ventilation (PSV) and zero PEEP impose work of breathing (WOB) during a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) similar to what a patient experiences after extubation. The aim of our study was to compare the WOB imposed by the T-piece with zero PSV and zero PEEP. We also compared the difference in WOB when using zero PSV and zero PEEP on 3 different ventilators. ⋯ Work may be imposed or reduced during spontaneous breathing on zero PSV and zero PEEP when compared to T-piece. The unpredictable nature of how zero PSV and zero PEEP behaves on different ventilators makes it an imprecise SBT modality in the context of assessing extubation readiness.
-
The spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) is the final step of weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation. An SBT is aimed at predicting work of breathing (WOB) after extubation and, most importantly, a patient's eligibility for extubation. The optimal SBT modality remains debated. A high-flow oxygen (HFO) has been tested during SBT in clinical study only, which is why no definite conclusion can be drawn on its physiologic effects on the endotracheal tube. Our objective was to assess, on a bench, inspiratory tidal volume (VT), total PEEP, and WOB across 3 different SBT modalities: T-piece, 40 L/min HFO, and 60 L/min HFO. ⋯ With the same effort intensity and breathing frequency, inspiratory VT was higher in the T-piece than in the other modalities. Compared with the T-piece, WOB was significantly lower in the HFO condition and higher flow was a benefit. Based on the results of the present study, the HFO as an SBT modality would seem to require clinical testing.