Articles: opioid-analgesics.
-
Psychother Psychosom · Jan 1991
Influence of psychological and clinical factors on postoperative pain and narcotic consumption.
Demographic, psychological and clinical factors influencing postoperative pain and narcotic analgesic requirements in 162 patients undergoing elective operations under general anesthesia were studied. Eysencks Personality Questionnaire, Foulds Hostility Questionnaire, Zung's Anxiety-Depression (self-rating) Scales and the 43 Item Life Events Inventory by Holmes and Rahe were used. ⋯ Postoperative narcotic requirements increase with increased postoperative pain levels (p = 0.039) and preoccupation with pain postoperatively (p = 0.025), preoperative analgesic drug use (p = 0.017), abdominal surgery (p = 0.009) and longer stay at hospital preoperatively (p = 0.016). Also the department in which the patients were hospitalized influenced narcotic consumption.
-
Many studies have demonstrated that cancer pain can be relieved in most cases by suitable analgesic medication. Patients with a diagnosis of "intractable cancer pain", however, are referred to our pain clinic nearly every day. A retrospective study of 1140 patients was therefore performed to evaluate the pain mechanisms and whether analgesic pretreatment had been adequate. ⋯ The principal causes for the inadequacy of the analgesic pretreatment were: failure to prescribe analgesics (10% of the patients), irregular intake schedule or prolonged intervals between applications (66%), underdosage of nonopioid analgesics (27%) or opioids (42%), and withholding of nonopioid analgesics (30%), strong opioids (14%), or co-analgesic drugs (17%), although their prescription was indicated. The severe pain was thus caused in many patients by simple mistakes in the prescription of analgesics. Terms like "intractable" should be used with caution when referring to cancer pain because they are often unreflected and can make patients and physicians feel helpless or insecure.
-
The antinociceptive interaction on the tail flick (TF) and hot plate (HP) tests between opioid analgesics and medetomidine after intravenous (iv) or intrathecal administration were examined by isobolographic analysis. Male Sprague-Dawley rats received fixed ratios of medetomidine to morphine, fentanyl, and meperidine of 1:10 and 1:30, 10:1, and 1:3, respectively, by iv administration or 10:1, 3:1 and 10:1, and 1:3 by intrathecal administration, respectively. Data were expressed as the percentage maximal possible effect (%MPE). ⋯ These data confirmed that the interaction between medetomidine and opioids in producing antinociception may be additive or synergistic, depending on the route of administration, drug ratio administered, and level of processing of the nociceptive input (i.e., spinal vs. supraspinal). Moreover, these results were consistent with a spinal role for alpha-2 adrenoceptors in mediating antinociception. The authors suggest that the interaction between the opioid and alpha-2 adrenergic receptors occurs within the spinal cord.
-
Physician education in cancer pain management is seriously deficient. Many problems occur with opioids simply because of therapeutic ignorance. Opioid side effects are best prevented by using morphine as the drug of first choice for severe pain. ⋯ Physicians need to be aware of how to transfer patients from one opioid to another or from one route of administration to another. Side effects common in clinical practice are constipation, nausea/vomiting, dry mouth, and sedation. The importance of the issues of tolerance, dependence, and respiratory depression have been exaggerated.