Articles: analgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Comparison between thoracic epidural analgesia VS patient controlled analgesia on chronic postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study.
To test the hypothesis that thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia (TEA) reduces the incidence of chronic postoperative pain (CPSP) after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). ⋯ A total of 231 patients were analyzed, including 114 in the PCIA group and 117 in the EPI group. Sixty-six patients (56.4 %) in the PCIA group and 33 patients (28.9 %) in the EPI group experienced chronic pain at 3 months postoperatively. The odds ratio (OR) was 0.31 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.54; P < 0.0001). After adjusting for confounding factors, the adjusted OR was 0.28 (95 % CI, 0.16 to 0.50, P < 0.001). Six months postoperatively, 50 (42.7 %) and 17 (14.9 %) patients in the PCIA and EPI groups, respectively, were diagnosed with CPSP (P < 0.0001).
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Oral ketamine for acute postoperative analgesia (OKAPA) trial: A randomized controlled, single center pilot study.
Although opioids represent the mainstay of treating surgical pain, their use is associated with significant side effects. There is an urgent need to find new pain relievers with safer side effect profiles. One drug that has been receiving increasing attention is ketamine. By using the oral route of administration, ketamine could potentially be used by patients in a less resource-intensive manner with similar efficacy. This study aims to examine the role of oral ketamine in improving recovery after major spine surgery. ⋯ This pilot study demonstrated that low dose oral ketamine can be safely used as an adjunct in postoperative pain treatment to help reduce opioid consumption after major spine surgery.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Combined spinal-epidural vs. dural puncture epidural techniques for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial.
The dural puncture epidural technique is a modification of the combined spinal-epidural technique. Data comparing the two techniques are limited. We performed this randomised study to compare the quality of labour analgesia following initiation of analgesia with the dural puncture epidural vs. the combined spinal-epidural technique. ⋯ There were no significant differences in the quality of labour analgesia following initiation of a combined spinal-epidural compared with a dural puncture epidural technique.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Jan 2025
Are labor epidural catheters after a combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique more reliable than after a traditional epidural? A retrospective review of 9153 labor epidural catheters.
The combined spinal epidural (CSE) technique may associate with a lower failure rate of epidural catheters compared to traditional epidural catheters. This may be significant for the parturients as failure of neuraxial analgesia has been associated with a negative impact on birth experience. ⋯ CSE technique was not associated with a better survival rate of epidural catheters for provision of analgesia or epidural top-up anesthesia for intrapartum CD. In addition, the time to replacement of the catheter was significantly longer when analgesia was initiated with the CSE technique. Maternal satisfaction scores were lower if catheters required replacement.
-
To investigate the relationship between offset analgesia magnitude and the responsiveness to conditioned pain modulation (CPM), temporal summation of (second) pain (TSP), and clinical pain severity in people with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). ⋯ Offset analgesia was not associated with CPM, TSP, or KOOS PAIN in people with KOA. Despite the lack of case-control studies comparing offset analgesia between people with KOA and healthy controls, these findings suggest that offset analgesia may provide information about endogenous pain modulation beyond CPM and TSP, though its clinical translation remains uncertain.