Articles: analgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
The influence of age upon opioid analgesic use in the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) environment.
It is often asserted that older patients are more sensitive to opioid analgesics than younger patients but experimental evidence for this assertion remains sparse. Two studies were conducted investigating the relationship between age and opioid analgesic use in the patient-controlled analgesia environment. In study I, the relationship was analysed subsequent to our publication of a study investigating patients' responses to opioid use with patient-controlled analgesia. ⋯ There was a difference in morphine use with the younger patients using significantly more morphine than the older patients (< 60 years). Findings were less clear for patients receiving pethidine but there was an inverse correlation between age and pethidine use as well. Overall, the findings of these two studies supported the common clinical belief that older patients require less opioids than younger patients.
-
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial[Comparative study of postoperative analgesia with methadone and fentanyl in continuous peridural perfusion].
To determine whether continuous epidural perfusion of fentanyl, which is more liposoluble than methadone, provides a similar level of analgesia with fewer side effects than methadone administered by the same route for postoperative pain. ⋯ Continuous epidural perfusion of fentanyl provides good analgesia and is associated with less hypoxemia than is methadone.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialEpidural bolus clonidine/morphine versus epidural patient-controlled bupivacaine/sufentanil: quality of postoperative analgesia and cost-identification analysis.
We compared the costs, quality of analgesia, and side effects of postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) with bupivacaine/sufentanil versus an epidural bolus (BOLUS) of clonidine/morphine in 68 patients with pancreatic surgery. Postoperative pain treatment was performed over 4 days: the PCEA pump was filled with bupivacaine 0.25% and sufentanil 2 micrograms/mL and set to 3-mL bolus and 10-min lockout time. BOLUS patients received injections of clonidine 150 micrograms plus morphine 2 mg on demand. Visual analog scale (VAS) score at rest and during coughing, heart rate (HR), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, pruritus, duration of intestinal paralysis, hospital treatment, and costs for personnel and material were recorded. VAS scores during coughing (3 +/- 2.5 vs 5 +/- 3, P < 0.001) was higher, and HR (79 +/- 13 vs 89 +/- 15, P < 0.001), and SAP (110 +/- 18 vs 124 +/- 23, P < 0.001) were lower, in the BOLUS compared with the PCEA group. The incidence of hypotension (SAP < 80 mm Hg) was greater (6 vs 0, P < 0.001) in the BOLUS group. The incidence of all other side effects was comparable. The costs of personnel ($204 +/- $40 vs $166 +/- $38, P < 0.001) were higher in the BOLUS group, but the costs of material ($51 +/- $17 vs $87 +/- $18, P < 0.001) were higher in the PCEA group. Total costs ($62 +/- $9 vs $62 +/- $11 per day, P = 0.9) were comparable. We conclude that because of superior analgesia and reduced side effects at analogous costs, PCEA is preferable to the BOLUS technique for the treatment of postoperative pain. ⋯ An epidural clonidine/morphine bolus technique resulted in inferior analgesia, more side effects, and comparable costs compared with a bupivacaine/sufentanil patient-controlled regimen in a randomized controlled trial after abdominal surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of the effect of intrathecal and extradural fentanyl on gastric emptying in laboring women.
We studied gastric emptying, using acetaminophen absorption, in 105 women in labor divided into three equal groups of 35 each, after intrathecal (i.t.) (25 micrograms, Group S) or extradural (50 micrograms, Group E) fentanyl in combination with bupivacaine and compared with a control group (Group C) receiving extradural bupivacaine only. The time to maximal acetaminophen concentration (tCamax), maximal acetaminophen concentration (Camax), and areas under the acetaminophen concentration-time curve at 90 and 120 min (AUC90 and AUC120, respectively) were determined. Median (range) tCamax values were 120 (15-180), 82.5 (15-180), and 90 (15-180) min in Groups S, E, and C, respectively (P < 0.05). Mean +/- SD Camax was 13.4 +/- 8.82, 17.9 +/- 8.06, and 15.0 +/- 6.22 micrograms/mL in Groups S, E, and C, respectively (P < 0.05). Mean +/- SD AUC90 and AUC120 were also significantly smaller in Group S than in the other two groups (430 +/- 616, 736 +/- 504, and 672 +/- 453; and 649 +/- 592, 1063 +/- 627, and 1053 +/- 616 micrograms.mL-1.min-1 in Groups S, E, and C, respectively). We conclude that the administration of fentanyl 25 micrograms i.t. delays gastric emptying in labor compared with both extradural fentanyl 50 micrograms with bupivacaine and extradural bupivacaine alone. ⋯ We examined emptying of the stomach in women in labor after administration of analgesics by the spinal or the epidural route. We observed that the analgesic, fentanyl, administered by the spinal route, although relieving pain rapidly, may delay emptying of the stomach. In theory, delayed gastric emptying may increase the chance of vomiting and aspiration of gastric contents.
-
Epidural steroid therapy is a commonly applied "conservative" therapy, but it is not inherently benign. Although arachnoiditis, infection, and meningitis have been reported, acute paraplegia has not been reported as a complication of either caudal or spinal epidural steroid injection. A unique case of transient, profound paralysis after epidural steroid injection is reported here. ⋯ Although pathologic confirmation of the cause was not possible, the potential for this alarming complication should be recognized by physicians prescribing epidural steroid therapy. We do not suggest that epidural steroid therapy is the treatment of choice for patients with multiple back operations or that it is efficacious for these patients. Our purpose is to alert surgeons and therapists to a rare but potentially devastating complication and to provide our experience in treating it.