Articles: analgesia.
-
Minerva anestesiologica · Oct 1989
Comparative Study[Anesthesia for shoulder surgery. Comparison of anesthesiologic problems and technics].
We evaluated the ability of general, regional (interscalene block) and balanced anaesthesia (interscalene block supplemented by general anaesthesia) to manage the problems of shoulder surgery. Our results show that general anaesthesia is not adequate. ⋯ The positions of patient and surgeons cause the main disadvantages of anaesthesia with interscalene block alone, ad the control of airway of sedated patients is difficult and performing general anaesthesia in case of insufficient analgesia may be troublesome. Balanced anaesthesia, as compared to regional block alone, allows a safer control of respiration and an easier control of surgical analgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Advantages of the paramedian approach for lumbar epidural analgesia with catheter technique. A clinical comparison between midline and paramedian approaches.
Forty-nine patients, scheduled for transurethral resection of the prostate or a bladder neoplasm on 50 occasions, were studied. The patients were randomly allocated to one of the two methods of puncture, midline or paramedian. Technical difficulties and the occurrence of complications were recorded. ⋯ The catheter entered a vessel at first in two patients in each group. No significant differences were demonstrated between the groups in the extent of sensory and motor blockade. The study supports the view that the paramedian approach has technical advantages over the midline approach for lumbar epidural analgesia with catheter technique.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Prevention of epidural morphine-induced respiratory depression with intravenous nalbuphine infusion in post-thoracotomy patients.
The efficacy of nalbuphine, an agonist/antagonist opioid, in preventing respiratory depression from epidural morphine analgesia after thoracotomy, was assessed in a randomized double-blind placebo controlled trial. After a standardized general anaesthetic and 0.15 mg.kg-1 of epidural morphine, patients received a bolus and then a 24 h infusion of nalbuphine (200 micrograms.kg-1 + 50 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1, 100 micrograms.kg-1 + 25 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1, or 50 micrograms.kg-1 + 12.5 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1) or placebo. ⋯ A 200 micrograms.kg-1 bolus of nalbuphine followed by a 50 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1 infusion achieved a mean steady state blood level of 38.2 ng.ml-1 and prevented CO2 retention greater than 50 mmHg in all but two patients, neither of whom required naloxone. There was no difference in the incidence of side effects among groups, and analgesia appeared to be unaffected by nalbuphine.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of bupivacaine and bupivacaine with fentanyl in continuous extradural analgesia during labour.
In a randomized, double-blind study of 39 mothers in labour, we have compared a loading dose of 0.5% bupivacaine 6.0 ml and fentanyl 100 micrograms given extradurally, followed by an infusion of 0.08% bupivacaine 15 ml h-1 plus fentanyl 37.5 micrograms h-1, with a loading dose of 0.5% bupivacaine 6.0 ml and saline 2.0 ml, followed by an extradural infusion of 0.08% bupivacaine alone, per hour. Analgesic levels were more consistent and sustained in mothers who received fentanyl in addition to bupivacaine, and the duration from the time of the loading dose to the first top-up was extended considerably in this group. The only significant side effect was a high incidence of mild pruritus in the fentanyl group. The addition of fentanyl to the extradural loading dose and subsequent infusion of local anaesthetic is a satisfactory alternative to giving higher doses of local anaesthetic alone.