Articles: neuropathic-pain.
-
Review
Neuropathic pain screening questionnaires have limited measurement properties. A systematic review.
The Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4), ID Pain, Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (LANSS), PainDETECT, and Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire have been recommended as screening questionnaires for neuropathic pain. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the measurement properties (eg, criterion validity and reliability) of these questionnaires. ⋯ Overall, the DN4 and Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire were most suitable for clinical use. These screening questionnaires should not replace a thorough clinical assessment.
-
J. Korean Med. Sci. · Aug 2015
Mechanical Antiallodynic Effect of Intrathecal Nefopam in a Rat Neuropathic Pain Model.
Nefopam has a pharmacologic profile distinct from that of opioids or other anti-inflammatory drugs. Several recent studies demonstrate that nefopam has a mechanism of action similar to those of anti-depressants and anticonvulsants for treating neuropathic pain. The present study investigates the mechanical antiallodynic effect of nefopam using immunohistochemical study and western blot analysis in a rat neuropathic pain model. ⋯ The N10 and N100 groups showed improved mechanical allodynic threshold, reduced CD11b and GFAP expression, and attenuated ERK 1/2 and CREB in the affected L5 spinal cord. In conclusion, intrathecal nefopam reduced mechanical allodynia in a rat neuropathic pain model. Its mechanical antiallodynic effect is associated with inhibition of glial activation and suppression of the transcription factors' mitogen-activated protein kinases in the spinal cord.
-
OBJECT Ependymomas represent the most common intramedullary tumor in adults. Despite their usually well-defined dissection plane, surgical morbidity has been documented to be considerably higher compared with other intramedullary entities. This study presents an analysis of risk factors for surgical morbidity and data on long-term results for intramedullary ependymomas. ⋯ A complete resection indicates cure for the overwhelming majority of these patients. Surgery should be performed early by neurosurgeons who deal with these lesions on a regular basis to achieve high GTR rates. Permanent surgical morbidity varies most according to tumor location and patient age.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Combination of morphine with nortriptyline for neuropathic pain.
First-line neuropathic pain drugs, including tricyclic antidepressants, are not always effective, and opioids have been recommended as second line. This trial evaluates a nortriptyline-morphine combination, compared with each monotherapy. In this randomized, double-blind crossover trial, patients with neuropathic pain were enrolled at 1 site between January 25, 2010, and May 22, 2014, and randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio using a balanced Latin square design to receive oral nortriptyline, morphine, and their combination. ⋯ Combination treatment resulted in moderate-severe constipation in 43% vs 46% with morphine (P = 0.82) and 5% with nortriptyline (P < 0.0001). Combination treatment resulted in moderate-severe dry mouth in 58% vs 49% with nortriptyline (P = 0.84) and 13% with morphine (P < 0.0001). This trial suggests superior efficacy of a nortriptyline-morphine combination over either monotherapy with constipation, dry mouth, and somnolence as the most frequent adverse effects.
-
Expert Opin Drug Saf · Aug 2015
ReviewMinimizing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: preclinical and clinical development of new perspectives.
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathies (CIPN) are a dose-limiting adverse effect of certain anticancer drugs (platinum salts, vinca alkaloids, taxanes, bortezomib, thalidomide, epothilones, eribulin). CIPN are mainly responsible for sensory disturbances and are associated with a decrease in quality of life. After the end of chemotherapy, CIPN can last for several months and even years. Unfortunately, recent meta-analyses of clinical trials have demonstrated that there is no univocal gold standard for the prevention and treatment of CIPN. ⋯ To date, based on meta-analyses of clinical trials, no drug can be proposed as a gold standard to prevent or treat CIPN. Consequently, there is a strong discrepancy between the optimistic results of animal studies and the poor outcomes of clinical trials. Pain assessment in preclinical and clinical studies is probably not the best outcome measurement tool and all these studies should include composite outcomes including the full complexity of CIPN symptoms, such as positive symptoms (pain, paresthesia, and dysesthesia) and negative ones (numbness).