Articles: neuropathic-pain.
-
Neuropathic pain (NeP) syndromes remain a difficult-to-treat medical entity. Despite a growing number of pharmacological and invasive analgesic therapies the results remain less than optimal because of insufficient analgesic efficacy and/or occurrence of pronounced side effects. Current guidelines propose the use of multimodal and balanced pharmacological therapies, focused on the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms (mechanistic approach). ⋯ However, these patches can also be used for the treatment of different types of superficial NeP syndromes, such as diabetic polyneuropathy. Their therapeutic success, however, largely depends on the correct identification of appropriate patients and pain syndromes. This manuscript outlines the correct identification of patients and proper use of these patches in order to ensure as much as possible the therapeutic efficacy of this new treatment option.
-
Journal of pain research · Jan 2010
An open-label, non-randomized comparison of venlafaxine and gabapentin as monotherapy or adjuvant therapy in the management of neuropathic pain in patients with peripheral neuropathy.
Although many therapies are used in the management of neuropathic pain (NeP) due to polyneuropathy (PN), few comparison studies exist. We performed a prospective, non-randomized, unblended, efficacy comparison of the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor venlafaxine, as either monotherapy or adjuvant therapy, with a first-line medication for NeP, gabapentin, in patients with PN-related NeP. VAS pain scores were assessed after 3 and 6 months in intervention groups and in a cohort of patients receiving no pharmacotherapy. ⋯ Improvements in aspects of daily life and anxiety were identified in all treatment groups. Our data suggest that monotherapy or adjuvant therapy with venlafaxine is comparable to gabapentin for NeP management. We advocate for head-to-head, randomized, double-blinded studies of current NeP therapies.
-
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes · Jan 2010
Maintaining efficacy in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: role of duloxetine.
Neuropathy is one of the most frequent complications of diabetes. Of all the symptoms associated with diabetic neuropathy, pain has the largest impact on sleep and quality of life. In the past few years further medications have been added to the available therapies for neuropathic pain. One of these medications, duloxetine hydrochloride (duloxetine), is a balanced and potent selective serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. ⋯ This article reviewed the issues related to management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain, the pharmacology and rationale for use of duloxetine, efficacy studies, and the safety and tolerability of treatment with duloxetine. Duloxetine is an acceptable initial or alternative treatment for patients with diabetic neuropathic pain.
-
Introduction. Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) has been used for many years to treat neuropathic pain syndromes. Technical advances in neurostimulation hardware have led to a renewed interest in the use of PNS for control of intractable pain caused by peripheral mononeuropathies. One such application includes intractable groin pain. ⋯ Discussion. The successful use of ultrasound as described in these two cases suggests an important role for ultrasound in localization of targeted nerves in percutaneous trial stimulation of injured peripheral nerve. The use of ultrasound may also play a role in permanent lead placement as well. Conclusion. More studies are needed to further qualify the role of ultrasound in isolating peripheral nerves, but the success of trial stimulation in these two cases holds promise for continued advancements in the field of neuromodulation.
-
Introduction. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an effective treatment option for neuropathic pain. However, because of the obvious procedural issues, SCS is unable to reach certain areas, such as the face, thorax, coccyx, the cervico-dorsal and lumbar areas, and the sacral, abdominal, and inguinal regions. On the other hand, these areas are easily reached by subcutaneous field stimulation. ⋯ As a result of pain reduction, the patients' quality of life improved. There were no adverse events reported except for early electrode array displacement in two of our patients. Conclusion. When SCS is not appropriate for certain neuropathic pain syndromes, subcutaneous field stimulation may be used with some degree of efficacy.