Articles: low-back-pain.
-
Prolotherapy involves repeated injections of irritant solutions to strengthen lumbosacral ligaments and reduce some types of chronic low-back pain; spinal manipulation and exercises are often used to enhance its effectiveness. ⋯ There is conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of prolotherapy injections for patients with chronic low-back pain. When used alone, prolotherapy is not an effective treatment for chronic low-back pain. When combined with spinal manipulation, exercise, and other co-interventions, prolotherapy may improve chronic low-back pain and disability. Conclusions are confounded by clinical heterogeneity amongst studies and by the presence of co-interventions.
-
Arthritis and rheumatism · Apr 2007
Randomized Controlled TrialA brief pain management program compared with physical therapy for low back pain: results from an economic analysis alongside a randomized clinical trial.
Guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care recommend early intervention to address psychosocial risk factors associated with long-term disability. We assessed the cost utility and cost effectiveness of a brief pain management program (BPM) targeting psychosocial factors compared with physical therapy (PT) for primary care patients with low back pain of <12 weeks' duration. ⋯ PT is a cost-effective primary care management strategy for low back pain. However, the absence of a clinically superior treatment program raises the possibility that BPM could provide an additional primary care approach, administered in fewer sessions, allowing patient and doctor preferences to be considered.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Physical capacity tasks in chronic low back pain: what is the contributing role of cardiovascular capacity, pain and psychological factors?
To explore the association of personal and body functions with physical capacity tasks used in the evaluation of chronic low back pain (CLBP) treatment. ⋯ Cardiovascular capacity, pain intensity, fear of injury/movement, cognitions, and depression had statistically significant but clinically minor effects on several, but not all capacity tasks. Radiating pain, age and duration of complaints had no significant influence at all. Due to anthropometric differences men outperformed women on most tasks. Apparently the influence of many personal, physical but especially psychological factors on the selected capacity tasks is not high at all. This might indicate that these tasks are more objectively measuring physical capacity than expected.
-
J Am Acad Orthop Sur · Apr 2007
ReviewThe use of lumbar epidural/transforaminal steroids for managing spinal disease.
Lumbar epidural steroid injections are used to manage low back and leg pain (ie, sciatica). Utilization of the procedure is increasing, with Medicare spending for lumbar epidural procedures topping $175 million annually. Few prospective randomized controlled trials have clearly demonstrated the efficacy of epidural steroid injections; many have shown conflicting results. ⋯ Methodologic flaws limit interpretation of results from most scientific studies. As a tool for predicting surgical outcome, epidural spinal injection has been found to have a sensitivity between 65% and 100%, a specificity between 71% and 95%, and a positive predictive value as high as 95% for 1-year surgical outcome. Despite inconclusive evidence, when weighing the surgical alternatives and associated risk, cost, and outcomes, lumbar epidural steroid injections are a reasonable nonsurgical option in select patients.