Articles: low-back-pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Does physiotherapy management of low back pain change as a result of an evidence-based educational programme?
The concept of evidence-based medicine is important in providing efficient health care. The process uses research findings as the basis for clinical decision making. Evidence-based practice helps optimize current health care and enables the practitioners to be suitably accountable for the interventions they provide. Little work has been undertaken to examine how allied health professionals change their clinical practice in light of the latest evidence. The use of opinion leaders to disseminate new evidence around the management of low back pain into practice has been proposed. ⋯ Psychosocial factors have been identified as an important factor in the recovery of patients with low back pain. This project incorporated the latest evidence on the management of low back pain and utilized the theory of opinion leaders to disseminate this evidence into clinical practice. Whilst there were some limitations in the overall size of the study, the results help to give an insight into the challenges faced by the health care system and researchers alike to ensure quality evidence is actually utilized by practitioners for the benefits of patient care.
-
Multicenter Study
Outcome of subacute low back pain: influence of patients' and rheumatologists' characteristics.
To assess the outcome of subacute low back pain, to identify the characteristics of patients and physicians which were related to outcome and to evaluate the influence of rheumatologists' beliefs about back pain on their following the guidelines for physical and occupational activity. ⋯ Back pain commonly persists 3 months later in patients with subacute low back pain. Patients and rheumatologists still have negative beliefs about back pain. Rheumatologists' beliefs influence their following guidelines on physical and occupational activities. National education programmes about low back pain are needed in France.
-
A critical appraisal of the literature. ⋯ Authors of RCTs should adequately report on items that are essential to assess the applicability and clinical relevance of results. The presented list of items may help clinicians reading RCTs and authors of systematic reviews to draw more balanced conclusions on applicability and clinical relevance of results.
-
According to Prochaska's transtheoretical model, the Freiburg Questionnaire stages of chronic pain management (FQ-STAPM) were used to classify chronic back patients into 4 distinct motivational stages. The FQ-STAMP was completed by 163 chronic back pain patients. Pain chronicity was measured by the Mainz Pain Staging System; pain intensity was measured by the numeric rating scale. Healthcare system expenses were considered as number of consulted physicians, number of stays in hospital, and number of rehabilitation programs. As psychometric tests, the lower pain disability index (PDI), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and a quality of life score (SF36) were used. Patients were in the following motivational stages: precontemplation in 30%, preparation in 19%, action in 30%, maintenance in 21%. The intensity of pain in the precontemplation stage patients was significantly higher compared to patients in the maintenance stage. A lower pain chronicity was related to a significantly higher motivation. Moreover, there was a significant increase in healthcare system expenses by the lesser motivated patients. Patients in the maintenance stage used significantly less opioids than patients in the precontemplation stage. The higher motivated patients had a significantly lower PDI, a significantly lower HADS, and a significantly higher quality of life compared to less motivated patients. ⋯ The study indicates that the FQ-STAPM might be a useful tool to classify chronic back pain patients and to work out a strategy together with the patient relevant to the outcome of pain management among chronic back pain patients.
-
Comparative Study
A systematic review of pain drawing literature: should pain drawings be used for psychologic screening?
The use of pain drawings to identify the psychologic "state" of patients has been advocated. They are used for psychologic screening before considering treatments, such as surgery. For pain drawings to be clinically useful as a psychologic screen they need good positive and negative predictive values. We systematically reviewed the literature that directly compared pain drawing scoring systems with measures of psychologic state. ⋯ We conclude that the available data do not support the assumption that unusual pain drawings or extensive marking indicate disturbed psychologic state. There is no high quality evidence to support pain-drawing use as a psychologic assessment tool; therefore, pain drawings are not recommended for this purpose.