Articles: low-back-pain.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2006
ReviewWITHDRAWN: Injection therapy for subacute and chronic benign low-back pain.
Injection with anaesthetics and/or steroids is one of the treatment modalities used in patients with chronic low back pain which needs evaluation with respect to the effectiveness on short and long term pain relief. ⋯ Convincing evidence is lacking on the effects of injection therapies for low back pain. There is a need for more, well designed explanatory trials in this field.
-
Cochrane Db Syst Rev · Jan 2006
ReviewWITHDRAWN: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low-back pain.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequently prescribed medications worldwide and are widely used for patients with low back pain. ⋯ In conclusion, the evidence from the 51 trials included in this review suggests that NSAIDs are effective for short-term symptomatic relief in patients with acute low back pain. Furthermore, there does not seem to be a specific type of NSAID which is clearly more effective than others. Sufficient evidence on chronic low back pain is still lacking.
-
Bmc Musculoskel Dis · Jan 2006
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative StudyActive rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: cognitive-behavioral, physical, or both? First direct post-treatment results from a randomized controlled trial [ISRCTN22714229].
The treatment of non-specific chronic low back pain is often based on three different models regarding the development and maintenance of pain and especially functional limitations: the deconditioning model, the cognitive behavioral model and the biopsychosocial model. There is evidence that rehabilitation of patients with chronic low back pain is more effective than no treatment, but information is lacking about the differential effectiveness of different kinds of rehabilitation. A direct comparison of a physical, a cognitive-behavioral treatment and a combination of both has never been carried out so far. ⋯ All three active treatments were effective in comparison to no treatment, but no clinically relevant differences between the combined and the single component treatments were found.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Trait anger and blood pressure recovery following acute pain: evidence for opioid-mediated effects.
Previous work has suggested that positive associations between trait anger (TRANG) and pain sensitivity are due to dysfunctional endogenous opioid analgesic systems. In this study, we examined whether TRANG is associated with impaired opioid modulation of blood pressure (BP) recovery. A total of 46 pain-free normotensive controls and 69 normotensive chronic low back pain (LBP) sufferers received opioid blockade (8 mg naloxone i.v.) or placebo in randomized, counterbalanced order in separate sessions. ⋯ In controls, low TRANG was associated with blockade-induced recovery impairments, with no blockade effect in high TRANG participants. In LBP participants, blockade did not alter recovery regardless of TRANG (interaction ps < .05). Results support dysfunctional opioid modulation of BP recovery in healthy high TRANG controls and further suggest chronic pain-related impairments in opioid-mediated cardiovascular recovery.
-
Bmc Musculoskel Dis · Jan 2006
Multicenter Study Comparative StudyLumbar segmental mobility disorders: comparison of two methods of defining abnormal displacement kinematics in a cohort of patients with non-specific mechanical low back pain.
Lumbar segmental rigidity (LSR) and lumbar segmental instability (LSI) are believed to be associated with low back pain (LBP), and identification of these disorders is believed to be useful for directing intervention choices. Previous studies have focussed on lumbar segmental rotation and translation, but have used widely varying methodologies. Cut-off points for the diagnosis of LSR & LSI are largely arbitrary. Prevalence of these lumbar segmental mobility disorders (LSMDs) in a non-surgical, primary care LBP population has not been established. ⋯ LSMDs are a valid means of defining sub-groups within non-specific LBP, in a conservative care population of patients with RCLBP. Prevalence was higher using the normalised within-subjects contribution-to-total-lumbar-motion approach.