Articles: low-back-pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Osteopathic manipulative treatment for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.
A randomized controlled trial was conducted. ⋯ Osteopathic manipulative treatment and sham manipulation both appear to provide some benefits when used in addition to usual care for the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain. It remains unclear whether the benefits of osteopathic manipulative treatment can be attributed to the manipulative techniques themselves or whether they are related to other aspects of osteopathic manipulative treatment, such as range of motion activities or time spent interacting with patients, which may represent placebo effects.
-
The intervertebral disc is the focal point of pathology for most low back pain. Contained disc herniation is a common cause of low back pain and, when unresponsive to conservative measures, is often treatable by disc decompression. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous disc decompression using Coblation (Nucleoplasty) in the treatment of back and/or leg pain associated with contained disc herniation, a prospective, nonrandomized cohort analysis was conducted in an interventional pain management practice. ⋯ Additionally, significant improvement was reported by 54%, 44%, and 49% of patients in sitting, standing and walking abilities, respectively, at 12 months. There were no instances of complications. These results indicate that disc decompression using Coblation (Nucleoplasty) is a safe and efficacious procedure for reducing discogenic low back pain with or without leg pain.
-
Epidural adhesiolysis with spinal endoscopy is an emerging interventional pain management technique in managing chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain. However, there is a lack of significant data demonstrating the effectiveness of spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis. This randomized, double-blind controlled trial was undertaken to determine the ability of spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis to reduce pain and improve functional and psychological status. ⋯ Based on the definition that less than 6 months of relief is considered as short-term and longer than 6 months is considered as long-term, a significant number of patients obtained long-term relief. The results showed significant improvement in patients undergoing spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis at 1-month, 3-months, and 6-months, compared to baseline measurements, as well as compared to the control group without adhesiolysis. Spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis with targeted injection of local anesthetic and steroid, is an effective treatment in a significant number of patients without major adverse effects at 6-month follow-up.
-
Epidural injections with or without steroids are used extensively in the management of chronic spinal pain. However, evidence is contradictory with continuing debate about the value of epidural steroid injections in chronic spinal syndromes. The objective of this systematic review is to determine the effectiveness of epidural injections in the treatment of chronic spinal pain. ⋯ Further, evidence was moderate for caudal epidural injections in managing lumbar radicular pain. The evidence in management of chronic neck pain, chronic low back pain, cervical radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, and post laminectomy syndrome was limited or inconclusive. In conclusion, the evidence of effectiveness of transforaminal epidural injections in managing lumbar nerve root pain was strong, whereas, effectiveness of caudal epidural injections in managing lumbar radiculopathy was moderate, while there was limited or inconclusive evidence of effectiveness of epidural injections in managing chronic spinal pain without radiculopathy, spinal stenosis, post lumbar laminectomy syndrome, and cervical radiculopathy.
-
It is estimated that over 50% of approximately 4 million interventional procedures performed annually in the United States are performed utilizing fluoroscopy. Fluoroscopy offers validity to interventional techniques by providing precise localization of anatomic target areas and facilitating accurate delivery of injectate. Exposure to ionizing radiation is an unavoidable consequence while performing fluoroscopic procedures. ⋯ Results of this study showed an average exposure per patient of 8.9 -/+ 0.4 seconds and per procedure of 4.9 -/+ 0.11 seconds. Scatter radiation exposure was higher outside the lead aprons compared to inside the lead aprons. Scatter radiation exposure at groin level was similar with or without lead shielding from the table to the floor.