Articles: low-back-pain.
-
Review
Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain.
A systematic review of observational studies. ⋯ Evidence was found for an effect of low workplace social support and low job satisfaction. However, the result for workplace social support was sensitive to slight changes in the rating system, and the effect found for low job satisfaction may be a result of insufficient adjustment for psychosocial work characteristics and physical load at work. In addition, the combined evaluation of job content and job control, both aspects of decision latitude, led to strong evidence of a role for low job decision latitude. Thus, based on this review, there is evidence for an effect of work-related psychosocial factors, but the evidence for the role of specific factors has not been established yet.
-
Experimental design. ⋯ Pain reduction after facet joint injections did not influence isokinetic muscle performance in patients with degenerative low back disorders.
-
Background. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is being used with increasing frequency in the treatment of various chronic pain conditions. There is a paucity of reliable outcome data regarding changes in pain tolerance and peripheral sensory nerve function. ⋯ The results of this study appear to substantiate the postulates that both segmental and suprasegmental effects are involved in SCS-mediated analgesia. SCS modulates segmental large afferent fiber input as reflected by a statistically significant increase in large fiber CPTs (2000 Hz) at the symptomatic site post-SCS. A statistically significant increase in small fiber (5 Hz) CPTs at the control site suggests a central sensory (suprasegmental) modulating effect on nociceptive fiber activity. sNCT testing provided reliable outcome data for evaluating response to SCS.
-
Many studies have documented an association between chronic low back pain (LBP) and deficits in back muscle strength and endurance. The sub-optimal performance is believed to be the result of alterations in the size and structure of the muscle, although the long-standing issue of whether the observed changes precede or are a consequence of the pain remains unresolved. If consequent to the problem, and predominantly related to disuse of the muscles, then it may be expected that a relationship between muscle structure and symptom duration would exist. ⋯ The results suggest that, over the long term, fibre type transformations rather than alterations in fibre size are the predominant changes to be found in the muscles of chronic LBP patients. The direction of change supports the results of many previous studies that have demonstrated corresponding differences in the fatigability of the muscles. There is a strong case for the early implementation of active measures to attempt to offset the development of these changes in back pain patients.
-
Increasing documentation on the size and appearance of muscles in the lumbar spine of low back pain (LBP) patients is available in the literature. However, a comparative study between unoperated chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients and matched (age, gender, physical activity, height and weight) healthy controls with regard to muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and the amount of fat deposits at different levels has never been undertaken. Moreover, since a recent focus in the physiotherapy management of patients with LBP has been the specific training of the stabilizing muscles, there is a need for quantifying and qualifying the multifidus. ⋯ An aetiological relationship between atrophy of the multifidus and the occurrence of LBP can not be ruled out as a possible explanation. Alternatively, atrophy may be the consequence of LBP: after the onset of pain and possible long-loop inhibition of the multifidus a combination of reflex inhibition and substitution patterns of the trunk muscles may work together and could cause a selective atrophy of the multifidus. Since this muscle is considered important for lumbar segmental stability, the phenomenon of atrophy may be a reason for the high recurrence rate of LBP.