Articles: low-back-pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Efficacy of cognitive therapy for chronic low back pain.
The effects of outpatient group cognitive therapy, relaxation training, and cognitive therapy in combination with relaxation training on chronic low back pain and associated physical and psychosocial disability were evaluated and compared. One-hundred and two mildly disabled chronic low back pain patients were assigned randomly to a waiting-list (WL) control condition and the 3 treatments. ⋯ Depressive symptoms and disability improved significantly in all conditions (including the waiting list) from pretreatment to post-treatment, with no statistically significant differences among treatments. At both follow-ups, all 3 treatment groups remained significantly improved from pretreatment, with no statistically significant differences between treatments.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
A randomized double-blind trial of dextrose-glycerine-phenol injections for chronic, low back pain.
This randomized clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of injections of a dextrose-glycerine-phenol connective tissue proliferant into the posterior ligaments, fascia, and joint capsules to treat chronic low back pain. Seventy-nine patients with chronic low back pain that had failed to respond to previous conservative care were randomly assigned to receive a double-blind series of six injections at weekly intervals of either Xylocaine/saline solution or Xylocaine/proliferant into the posterior sacroiliac and interspinous ligaments, fascia, and joint capsules of the low back from L4 to the sacrum. Patients were observed with a visual analog, disability, and pain grid scores, and with objective computerized triaxial tests of lumbar function for 6 months following conclusion of injections. ⋯ Improvements in visual analog (p = 0.056), disability (p = 0.068), and pain grid scores (p = 0.025) were greater in the proliferant group. Objective testing of range of motion, isometric strength, and velocity of movement showed significant improvements in both groups following treatment but did not favor either group. The MRI and CT scans showed significant abnormalities in both groups, but these did not correlate with subjective complaints and were not predictive of response to treatment.
-
J Manipulative Physiol Ther · Jan 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe Hmax/Mmax ratio as an outcome measure for acute low back pain.
To evaluate the use of the Hmax/Mmax (H/M) ratio as an outcome measure for acute low back pain and to determine the change of this ratio in acute low back pain patients treated with spinal manipulation. ⋯ The H/M ratio was found to be within normal limits in subjects with acute low back pain. The H/M ratio showed greater change in the group which received spinal manipulation, but the change was subtle. The results indicate that the H/M ratio may be of limited value in clinical practice.
-
Scand J Prim Health Care · Dec 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialTreatment of pelvic joint dysfunction in primary care--a controlled study.
The study evaluated the manual treatment of dysfunction of the pelvic joints. This is one of many condition causing low back pain. In 1987-1988 a general practitioner with special knowledge of physical examination and manual treatment of lumbar and pelvic dysfunctions made a survey of patients with acute or subacute low back pain as the main cause of the patient-to-doctor contact. ⋯ After a period of three weeks, evaluation was made by an independent observer. Subjective pain measurement and a mobility test showed no significant difference. Sick-leave and consumption of analgesics (both decided by patient) were significantly less in the treatment group.
-
Scand J Prim Health Care · Sep 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialA controlled, multicentre trial of manual therapy in low-back pain. Initial status, sick-leave and pain score during follow-up.
101 outpatients with acute or subacute low-back pain were randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups. One group was given standardized conventional but optimal activating treatment by primary health care teams. The other group received manual treatment such as manipulation, specific mobilization, muscle stretching, auto-traction, and cortisone injections. ⋯ The difference diminished over time but was still significant after eight months. Two slightly different pain scores ("pain at the moment" and "pain during the last weeks"), initially similar in the two groups, diminished in both groups but were significantly lower in the manual treatment group during the study. The group receiving specific manual treatment thus had a significantly better outcome than the group receiving conventional treatment as far as sick-leave and pain score are concerned.