Articles: general-anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Pediatric surgery. A comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia].
Forty patients aged 2 to 5 years who were admitted for paediatric operations were randomly assigned to have either spinal or general anaesthesia. Spinal anaesthesia was achieved with isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg. General anaesthesia was induced with thiopentone 2-5 mg/kg and continued with low-dose fentanyl (1-2 micrograms/kg, oxygen/nitrous oxide/isoflurane (30/70/0.1-0.5%), vecuronium normoventilating the patients. ⋯ Vomiting (2), sore throat (4) and micturition difficulties (2) were the adverse events associated with general anaesthesia. Three patients were restless after spinal anaesthesia. It can be concluded that spinal anaesthesia is a suitable anaesthetic technique for paediatric surgery.
-
Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Anesthetic techniques during surgical repair of femoral neck fractures. A meta-analysis.
Fracture of the hip typically occurs in older women. These patients usually have serious accompanying chronic illnesses. There is a difference of opinion as to the choice of regional versus general anesthesia for surgery in these patients. ⋯ By probability difference, mortality was a non-significant 2.7 percentage points less following regional anesthesia. By odds ratio effect measure, death was 1.5 times more likely following general anesthesia, but the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval was close to 1. Meta-analysis does not allow a conclusion that important differences in mortality exist between regional and general anesthesia for traumatic hip fracture surgery.
-
The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) provides a patent airway when placed 'blindly' into the hypopharynx. At the laryngeal side it is supposed to form a seal surrounding the laryngeal inlet with the epiglottis lying outside the mask aperture. This study is designed to assess the prelaryngeal position of the mask by the fibreoptic technique. ⋯ For patients who are at risk of regurgitation of gastric contents, use of the LMA is absolutely contraindicated. Relative contraindications are local pathology of the pharynx and situations with low pulmonary compliance and/or high airway resistance (massive obesity, asthma, etc.), especially during controlled ventilation. Further studies are necessary to establish definite indications for the application of the LMA.