Articles: general-anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Recovery times and side effects after propofol infusion and after isoflurane during ear surgery with additional infiltration anaesthesia.
Two anaesthetic procedures that did not include nitrous oxide were compared in a randomised study of 50 patients for tympanoplasty and tympanoscopy: propofol given for induction and maintenance, and thiopentone-isoflurane given for induction and maintenance, respectively. Induction in the first group was with a bolus injection of propofol and the same agent was given for the duration of anaesthesia by continuous intravenous administration. Thiopentone was given until loss of the eyelash reflex and anaesthesia maintained with isoflurane 0.4-2.0%. ⋯ The two patient groups were analysed for age, sex and weight as well as for side effects during the induction, maintenance and recovery periods, such as coughing, vomiting, venous pain, spontaneous movements, singultus, headaches, dysrhythmias and psychic disorders possibly due to anaesthesia. Side effects were moderate in both groups. Recovery time was statistically significantly shorter in the propofol group and the patients in this group appeared to be much more aware after recovery than those in the thiopentone-isoflurane group.
-
Comparative Study
Infusions of propofol to supplement nitrous oxide-oxygen for the maintenance of anaesthesia. A comparison with halothane.
The peri-operative and postoperative effects of propofol given by infusion were compared with halothane as a supplement to nitrous oxide-oxygen anaesthesia for body surface surgery in patients who breathed spontaneously. Anaesthesia was induced after opioid premedication, with either propofol 2.5 mg/kg or thiopentone 4-5 mg/kg which were followed respectively by an infusion of propofol 12 mg/kg/hour for 10 minutes and at a variable rate thereafter, or by halothane at a mean inspired concentration of 1.2%. ⋯ The cardiovascular effects during induction and maintenance of anaesthesia were similar in the two groups. The overall incidence of side effects was low but immediate recovery was significantly faster in patients who received propofol.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Pain-free injection in infants. Use of a lignocaine-prilocaine cream to prevent pain at intravenous induction of general anaesthesia in 1-5-year-old children.
A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was undertaken in 111 children between the ages of 1 and 5 years to assess the efficacy of EMLA 5% cream in the alleviation of venepuncture pain at intravenous induction of general anaesthesia using 27-gauge needles. Pain assessment was made by an operating department assistant using both verbal rating scale and visual analogue scale methods. ⋯ Significantly lower pain scores were recorded in the children treated with EMLA cream (verbal rating scale: premedicated p less than 0.05, unpremedicated p less than 0.001; visual analogue scale: premedicated p less than 0.0005, unpremedicated p less than 0.0002). No variation in analgesia was found for application times between 30 and 300 minutes and there were no serious side effects.
-
Ann R Coll Surg Engl · Mar 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparative evaluation of general, epidural and spinal anaesthesia for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.
The results of a prospective randomised evaluation of general anaesthesia (GA), epidural anaesthesia (EA) and spinal anaesthesia (SA) for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy are presented. GA provided speed and reliability but resulted in a high incidence of postoperative nausea, vomiting and sore throat. ⋯ A major drawback associated with the use of SA was a 42% incidence of postspinal headache. All three techniques were associated with hypotension on placement in the hoisl; bath immersion resulted in significant rises in blood pressure in the EA and SA groups and a more variable (overall non-significant) response in the GA group.