Articles: chronic-pain.
-
The prevalence of illicit drug use by patients in a chronic pain management practice who concomitantly abuse prescription-controlled substances is not known. The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of illicit drug use by patients in an interventional pain management practice, based on whether or not there was evidence of simultaneous abuse of prescription drugs. One hundred and fifty patients in an interventional pain management practice who were prescribed controlled substances for pain treatment were selected for assessment of concomitant illicit drug use by urine drug testing. ⋯ Marijuana was the drug of choice in both groups, with 22% in the prescription abuse group and 10% in the non-abuse group. The second most commonly used illicit drug in both groups was cocaine. This study demonstrated a clinically significant use of illicit drugs, particularly marijuana and cocaine in an interventional pain management setting, in patients with or without evidence of concomitant abuse of prescription controlled substances.
-
The Model 8831 Personal Therapy Manager (PTM) offers a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) option for the SynchroMed Infusion System (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN). The safety and effective operation of the PTM activator was evaluated in 45 patients in five European centers receiving intrathecal drug infusion for the treatment of chronic pain via a SynchroMed pump. The total volume of drug delivered intrathecally over a four-week follow-up period was calculated. ⋯ Patients appreciated being able to control their pain and considered the device and its instructions easy to use. The PTM was shown to be safe and functioning properly in the intrathecal treatment of pain. The successful addition of a PCA function to the SynchroMed system may create a new standard in intrathecal pain therapy.
-
Controlled substance abuse has increased at an alarming rate. However, available evidence suggests a wide variance in the use of controlled substances, as documented by different medical specialties, medical boards, advocacy groups, and the Drug Enforcement Administration. The primary objective of controlled substance guidelines by American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) is to provide guidance for the use of controlled substances for the treatment of chronic pain. ⋯ It is expected that a provider will establish a plan of care on a case-by-case basis, taking into account an individual patient's medical condition, personal needs, and preferences, and the physician's experience. Based on an individual patient's needs, controlled substance prescribing and treatment different from that outlined here may be warranted. These guidelines do not represent "standard of care."
-
The objective of this study was to compare the cost and safety of intrathecal injection (IN) vs. epidural infusion (CE) trial and to provide a preliminary assessment of the prognostic value of each in the selection of patients for long-term continuous intrathecal opioid therapy (CIOT). Thirty-seven patients with chronic nonmalignant pain who were being considered for CIOT were randomized to morphine trial by IN or CE. Analgesic response and complications were monitored throughout trial. ⋯ There was no difference between IN and CE groups in McGill Pain rating, quality of life (VAS), mood (Profile of Mood States), or function (Sickness Impact Profile) after six months of CIOT. We conclude that intrathecal injection is a safe procedure for use in selection of patients for CIOT and is less costly than epidural infusion. Differences in pain and functional response to long-term opioids among patients selected by either trial method are not large.
-
While spinal cord stimulation has commonly been carried out using percutaneous leads, these devices have limitations in cervical implants due to problems with positional stimulation and lead migration. Paddle leads, by virtue of their design, are more stable in their apposition to the neural elements; however, mid and lower cervical insertions have been associated with both acute and subacute spinal cord injuries. These complications are likely related to limitations in canal diameter, as paddle leads occupy a greater volume than percutaneous leads. ⋯ No patient suffered neurologic sequelae as a result of this procedure. We have found C1-C2 sublaminar insertions of paddle leads to be a safe and effective way of treating neuropathic pain phenomenon involving the upper extremity. To further assess the relative benefit over percutaneous leads, a prospective trial would be required.