Articles: pain-measurement.
-
Comparative Study
The word-graphic rating scale as a measure of children's and adolescents' pain intensity.
A program of studies was designed to select and test a pain intensity scale for inclusion in a multidimensional pain assessment tool for children and adolescents. The focus was on determining each scale's validity, reliability, ease of use, preference, and the lack of age, gender, and ethnic biases. Five pain scales were evaluated in four separate studies: a word-graphic rating scale, a visual analogue scale, a graded-graphic rating scale, a magnitude estimation scale (0 to 10), and a color scale. ⋯ The scale demonstrated sensitivity to changes in postoperative pain intensity over time. In Study 4, convergent validity of the five scales and test-retest reliability of the word-graphic rating scale were supported. The series of four studies provides strong evidence to support use of the word-graphic rating scale to measure pain intensity in pediatric populations.
-
The Pain Disability Index (PDI) was developed as a self-report measure of general and domain-specific, pain-related disability. This study's purpose was twofold: (1) to assess construct validity of the scale relative to other measures of pain-related disability and psychologic distress and (2) to assess the strength of the PDI, independent of pain intensity, in accounting for behavioral and psychologic aspects of disability. ⋯ Partial correlation controlling for pain intensity demonstrated PDI factor 1 was significantly related to depression, employment status, and medication usage. The finding supports the usefulness of the PDI in providing important information on functional disability beyond what is provided by a simple measure of pain intensity.
-
Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs · Oct 1991
Comparative StudyChildren's ratings of postoperative pain compared to ratings by nurses and physicians.
Children's ratings of their postoperative pain were compared to nurses' and physicians' ratings of the children's postoperative pain. Children and adolescents were able to rate their pain using a visual analogue scale (VAS). ⋯ Also, the correlation between nurses and physicians was highly significant, indicating that the use of a VAS may help nurses and physicians explore the cues used to estimate children's pain. This dialogue may enhance communication and collaboration between professionals about pain management strategies specific to each child's pain experience.
-
J Manipulative Physiol Ther · Sep 1991
The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity.
Injuries to the cervical spine, especially those involving the soft tissues, represent a significant source of chronic disability. Methods of assessment for such disability, especially those targeted at activities of daily living which are most affected by neck pain, are few in number. A modification of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Index was conducted producing a 10-item scaled questionnaire entitled the Neck Disability Index (NDI). ⋯ These scores correlated at 0.60. Secondly, in a larger subset of 30 subjects, NDI scores were compared to scores on the McGill Pain Questionnaire, with similar moderately high correlations (0.69-0.70). While the sample size of some of the analyses is somewhat small, this study demonstrated that the NDI achieved a high degree of reliability and internal consistency.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of eight psychometric instruments in unselected patients with back pain.
A comparative evaluation of eight psychometric instruments was made in 274 patients who were currently suffering or previously had suffered from low-back pain. The specificity and sensitivity values for detection of psychological disturbance were calculated and optimum cutoff scores determined for each test. The influence of current pain, social group, compensation, migrant status, and unemployment on the accuracy of each test were evaluated. ⋯ The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety Scale, the Hospital Depression Scale, and the Zung Depression Scale were the most accurate and least affected by the factors examined. The combination of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire and the Zung Depression Scale yielded specificities and sensitivities of 91% and 84% for men and 96% and 85% for women, respectively. This combination is recommended for the assessment of psychological disturbance in patients with low-back pain.