Articles: pain-measurement.
-
In order to determine the relationship between trigger point sensitivity and the referred symptoms of myofascial pain, VAS ratings of referred pain intensity and pressure algometer measures of myofascial trigger point sensitivity were taken pre and post treatment of the muscle containing the trigger point with passive stretch. The results in 20 subjects, experiencing unilateral or bilateral myofascial head and neck pain, showed that myofascial trigger point sensitivity decreases in response to passive stretch as assessed by the pressure algometer, and that trigger point sensitivity and intensity of referred pain are related.
-
Comparative Study
The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods.
The measurement of subjective pain intensity continues to be important to both researchers and clinicians. Although several scales are currently used to assess the intensity construct, it remains unclear which of these provides the most precise, replicable, and predictively valid measure. Five criteria for judging intensity scales have been considered in previous research: ease of administration of scoring; relative rates of incorrect responding; sensitivity as defined by the number of available response categories; sensitivity as defined by statistical power; and the magnitude of the relationship between each scale and a linear combination of pain intensity indices. ⋯ The utility and validity of the scales was judged using the criteria listed above. The results indicate that, for the present sample, the scales yield similar results in terms of the number of subjects who respond correctly to them and their predictive validity. However, when considering the remaining 3 criteria, the 101-point numerical rating scale appears to be the most practical index.
-
The McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire (MMPQ), comprised primarily of adjectives descriptive of pain, was administered to 100 patients seeking treatment for headache. Diagnostic classification of patients into migraine or muscle contraction headache groups was conducted by a screening neurologist using information other than pain description. Reliability determinations were made following independent diagnosis by two other neurologists using a headache pain history and symptom form (HPHSF) devoid of pain adjectives. ⋯ Findings revealed that group membership could be predicted at a 90% rate (chi2 145 = 33.06, rho < .001). A cross validation on the second half of the sample confirmed these findings (chi2 1.48 = 13.08, rho < .05) suggesting that the MMPQ is of value in headache diagnosis. Differences between electromyographic studies and headache pain report are discussed as well as suggestions concerning modification of the MMPQ for headache assessment.
-
Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. · Jul 1967
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialPain and analgesia evaluated by the intraperitoneal bradykinin-evoked pain method in man.