Articles: pain-measurement.
-
Multicenter Study
Heart rate variability is not suitable as surrogate marker for pain intensity in patients with chronic pain.
The search towards more objective outcome measurements and consequently surrogate markers for pain started decades ago; however, no generally accepted biomarker for pain has qualified yet. The goal is to explore the value of heart rate variability (HRV) as surrogate marker for pain intensity chronic pain setting. Pain intensity scores and HRV were collected in 366 patients with chronic pain, through a cross-sectional multicenter study. ⋯ The highest surrogacy point estimate was found for mean heart rate as marker for average pain intensity on the numeric rating scale with point estimates of 0.0961 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0384-0.1537) and 0.0209 (95% CI 0-0.05) for patients without medication use and with medication, respectively. This study indicated that HRV parameters as separate entities are no suitable surrogacy candidates for pain intensity, in a population of chronic pain patients. Further potential surrogate candidates and clinical robust true endpoints should be explored, to find a surrogate measure for the highly individual pain experience.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Immersive Virtual Reality for Pain Control and Anxiolysis During IV Blood Draws in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
To evaluate immersive virtual reality's (IVR) effectiveness as a distraction in reducing perceived pain and anxiety among adults undergoing intravenous (IV) blood draw. ⋯ The results of our study demonstrated that there was no significantly lower perceived pain or anxiety when using IVR compared to standard practice in adults undergoing IV blood draw.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Jun 2023
ReviewPerioperative and anesthetic considerations for the management of neuromodulation systems.
The use of neuromodulation systems is increasing for the treatment of various pathologies ranging from movement disorders to urinary incontinence to chronic pain syndromes. While the type of neuromodulation devices varies, they are largely categorized as intracranial (eg, deep brain stimulation), neuraxial (eg, spinal cord stimulation, dorsal root ganglion stimulation, and intrathecal drug delivery systems), or peripheral (eg, sacral nerve stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation) systems. Given the increasing prevalence of these systems in the overall population, it is important for anesthesiologists, surgeons, and the perioperative healthcare team to familiarize themselves with these systems and their unique perioperative considerations. In this review, we explore and highlight the various neuromodulation systems, their general perioperative considerations, and notable special circumstances for perioperative management.