Articles: nerve-block.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Outpatient minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: a combination of sestamibi-SPECT localization, cervical block anesthesia, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay.
Despite the high cure rate and low morbidity of bilateral neck exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism, there is a movement toward minimizing the process in terms of incision, cost, extent of exploration, and length of hospital stay, while maintaining excellent outcomes. ⋯ Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy is a safe, cost-effective alternative to bilateral exploration and may be the procedure of choice for select patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.
-
Although several anterior approaches to sciatic nerve block have been described, they are used infrequently. The authors describe a new anterior approach that allows access to the sciatic nerve with the patient in the supine position. ⋯ This approach represents an easy and reliable anterior technique for performing sciatic nerve blocks.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1999
Comparative StudyHyperalgesia caused by nerve transection: long-lasting block prevents early hyperalgesia in the receptive field of the surviving nerve.
The aim of our study was to test the hypothesis that a long-lasting N-butyl tetracaine nerve block (>2 wk) would be much more effective in the prevention of hyperalgesia caused by nerve transection than the short-lasting lidocaine block. The study was performed with the use of the saphenous nerve section model in rats. The saphenous nerve was exposed and injected with saline, lidocaine (37 mM), or N-butyl tetracaine (37 mM). Ten minutes later, the nerve was transected in some of the rats. The development of mechanical hyperalgesia (pressure threshold) of the hindpaw was assessed during a 5-wk period. In rats with saphenous nerve transection without nerve block (saline injection), 3 h after the transection, the pressure threshold decreased by approximately 30% (from 175+/-11 g to 122+/-23 g, P < 0.0001); the threshold increased somewhat the next day, then it remained stable for 2 wk, with a slow process of recovery afterward. N-butyl tetracaine block without nerve transection caused a slow-developing decrease in the pressure threshold with the first statistically significant change at the sixth day. The comparison of the preventive effects of lidocaine and N-butyl tetracaine blocks on early hyperalgesia caused by nerve transection demonstrated that both lidocaine and N-butyl tetracaine prevented hyperalgesia 3 h after the transection. However, the protective effect of lidocaine disappeared the next day. In contrast, N-butyl tetracaine prevented early hyperalgesia for almost a week. The slow-developing late hyperalgesia caused by long-lasting nerve block makes it impossible to study the protective effect of such a block on late hyperalgesia caused by axotomy. As far as early hyperalgesia is concerned, the preventive effect of the N-butyl tetracaine was much longer than that of lidocaine and continued for approximately 1 wk. ⋯ A long-lasting nerve block can prevent early hyperalgesia caused by nerve transection.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe lateral approach to the sciatic nerve at the popliteal fossa: one or two injections?
It has not been proven whether one or multiple nerve stimulations and injections provide a higher rate of complete sensory block in both major sciatic nerve sensory distributions below the knee when a popliteal sciatic nerve block is performed using the lateral approach. This prospective, randomized, single-blinded study compared the success rate of the sciatic nerve block using this approach when one or both major components of this nerve (i.e., tibial nerve and common peroneal nerves) are stimulated in 50 patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery. In Group 1 STIM, 24 patients received a single injection of 20 mL of a mixture of 2% lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine after foot inversion had been elicited. In Group 2 STIM (n = 26), 10 mL of the same solution was injected after stimulation of each sciatic nerve component. For patients with complete sensory motor block, there was no difference in onset between groups. However, Group 2 STIM showed a greater success rate compared with the Group 1 STIM (2 STIM: 88% vs 1 STIM :54%; P = 0.007). When two stimulations were used, the onset time of anesthesia in the cutaneous distribution of the common peroneal nerves was shorter than in the tibial nerve (17.5 vs 30 min; P < 0.0001). We conclude that a two-stimulation technique provides a better success rate than a single-injection technique when a popliteal sciatic nerve block is performed using the lateral approach with 20 mL of local anesthetic. ⋯ A better success rate is achieved with a double stimulation technique than with a single injection for the sciatic nerve block via the lateral approach at the popliteal fossa when 20 mL of local anesthetics is used.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Nov 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial0.75% and 0.5% ropivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block: a clinical comparison with 0.5% bupivacaine.
Although ropivacaine has been extensively studied for epidural anesthesia, very few reports exist on brachial plexus block. We therefore decided to investigate the clinical features of axillary brachial plexus anesthesia with two different concentrations of ropivacaine (0.5% and 0.75%) and to compare the results with those obtained with 0.5% bupivacaine. ⋯ Ropivacaine showed advantages over bupivacaine for axillary brachial plexus block. Because no statistical differences were found between the two ropivacaine groups, we therefore conclude that 0.75% does not add benefit and that 0.5% ropivacaine should be used to perform axillary brachial plexus blocks.