Articles: nerve-block.
-
Oral Surg Oral Med O · Dec 1999
Customized EMG needle insertion guide for the muscle afferent block of jaw-deviation and jaw-opening dystonias.
Jaw-opening and jaw-deviation dystonias are characterized by mouth opening or lateral shift of the mandible due to involuntary contraction of the lateral pterygoid muscle, causing difficulties in speech or mastication. We introduce the method of muscle afferent block by using a removable device for inserting a hollow electromyographic needle. ⋯ The device is very useful for safe and accurate injection into the lateral pterygoid muscle. The muscle afferent block is effective for jaw-opening and jaw-deviation dystonias.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with 0.5%, 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine: a double-blind comparison with 2% mepivacaine.
We have compared interscalene brachial plexus block performed with ropivacaine or mepivacaine in 60 healthy patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery. Patients were allocated randomly to receive interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with 20 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine (n = 15), 0.75% ropivacaine (n = 15), 1% ropivacaine (n = 15) or 2% mepivacaine (n = 15). Readiness for surgery (loss of pinprick sensation from C4 to C7 and inability to elevate the limb from the bed) was achieved sooner with 1% ropivacaine (mean 10 (SD 5) min) than with 0.5% ropivacaine (22 (7) min) (P < 0.001) or 2% mepivacaine (18 (9) min) (P < 0.02). Postoperative analgesia was similar with the three ropivacaine concentrations (11.5 (5) h, 10.7 (2) h and 10 (2.4) h with 0.5%, 0.75% and 1% concentrations, respectively) and nearly two-fold longer compared with 2% mepivacaine (5.1 (2.7) h) (P < 0.001).
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of two techniques for cervical plexus blockade: evaluation of efficacy and systemic toxicity.
We compared two techniques of cervical plexus blockade (CPB) for carotid endarterectomy. Cervical plexus nerve block was performed with a combination of bupivacaine and lidocaine, with injections at the C2-C3, C3-C4, and C4-C5 transverse processes in 11 patients (classical CPB) or with a single injection after localization of the cervical plexus with a nerve stimulator in 12 patients (interscalene CPB). Pain scores were obtained during block placement and at predetermined phases of the operation. Arterial blood was sampled before and 3, 5, 8, 10, 15, 25, 40, and 60 min after CPB for measurement of bupivacaine and lidocaine concentrations. Interscalene CPB was less painful than classical CPB. The techniques appeared equally effective. Patients in both groups required equivalent supplementation with IV fentanyl and additional local infiltration with lidocaine during the most painful stages of surgery. The maximal concentration of bupivacaine was lower in interscalene CPB compared with classical CPB (1.0 microg/mL versus 1.5 microg/mL, P < 0.01). The time required to reach the maximal concentration of bupivacaine was 15 (10-40) min in interscalene CPB and 10 (5-17) min in classical CPB (P < 0.05). Lidocaine maximal concentration was similar in both groups, however the time required to reach the maximal concentration was longer (P < 0.05) in interscalene CPB (15 [10-60] min) than in classical CPB (10 [8-20] min). We conclude that the interscalene CPB is as effective as the classical CPB as a regional technique for carotid endarterectomy and may be associated with a lower systemic absorption of bupivacaine. ⋯ Cervical plexus blockade for carotid endarterectomy can be effectively performed with a single injection after localization of the cervical plexus with a nerve stimulator. This technique is simple and was associated with less systemic absorption of local anesthetic than the multiple-injection technique.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1999
Comparative StudyAnatomical landmarks for femoral nerve block: a comparison of four needle insertion sites.
The site for needle insertion in femoral nerve block varies significantly among various descriptions of the technique. To determine the site with the highest likelihood of needle-femoral nerve contact, femoral nerve block was simulated in a human cadaver model (17 femoral triangles from 9 adult cadavers). Four 20-gauge 50-mm-long styletted catheters were inserted at four frequently suggested insertion sites for femoral nerve block. At the levels of inguinal ligament and the inguinal crease, the catheters were inserted adjacent to the lateral border of the femoral artery and 2 cm lateral to the femoral artery. During anatomical dissection, we studied the number of catheter-nerve contacts for each of the four insertion sites, and relationships between the femoral nerve and other anatomical structures of relevance to femoral nerve block. Insertion of the needle at the level of the inguinal crease, next to the lateral border of the femoral artery resulted in the highest frequency of needle-femoral nerve contacts (71%). Of note, the femoral nerve was significantly wider (14.0 vs 9.8 mm) and closer to the fascia lata (6.8 vs 26.4 mm) at the inguinal crease than at the inguinal ligament level. We conclude that needle insertion at the inguinal crease level immediately adjacent to the femoral artery produced the highest rate of needle-femoral nerve contacts. The main factors influencing this result include the greater width of the femoral nerve and the more predictable femoral artery-femoral nerve relationship at the inguinal crease level, compared with the inguinal ligament level. ⋯ Insertion of a needle at the inguinal crease level and immediately adjacent to the lateral border of the femoral artery results in a high rate of needle-femoral nerve contact.
-
Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Outpatient minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: a combination of sestamibi-SPECT localization, cervical block anesthesia, and intraoperative parathyroid hormone assay.
Despite the high cure rate and low morbidity of bilateral neck exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism, there is a movement toward minimizing the process in terms of incision, cost, extent of exploration, and length of hospital stay, while maintaining excellent outcomes. ⋯ Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy is a safe, cost-effective alternative to bilateral exploration and may be the procedure of choice for select patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.