Articles: sepsis.
-
The effective treatment of sepsis and septic shock has remained elusive despite intense research efforts. The tools of molecular biology have been applied to the problem of sepsis in an attempt to design more rational, directed therapy. Cellular interactions with invading microorganisms begin a series of stimulation events within the cell. ⋯ The measurement of cytokines is critically important to our understanding of their role in health and disease. Cytokines may be measured by either immunologic methods or biological assays. Molecular biology has made important contributions to our understanding of sepsis by precisely identifying some of the mediators and providing reagents for therapeutic use.
-
Traditionally, sepsis is defined as a systemic inflammatory reaction of the organism to Gram-negative bacterial leading to septic shock--characterized by hemodynamic derangements--and eventually to septic multi-organ malfunction. Sepsis syndrome is diagnosed when fever and other abnormalities of vital signs are present along with abnormalities of one or more organ systems that are not the site of infection and trauma (but with an identifiable locus of infection), and is associated with a range of 30% to 50% mortality. In the United States, one of the most frequent and serious problems confronting clinicians is the management of a serious infection and the systemic response to the infection, such as sepsis. ⋯ Calcium plays vital roles in the intracellular regulation of a variety of cellular responses (for example, contraction, secretion, cell-cell communication, cell proliferation) under physiologic conditions in various cell-types. Alterations in intracellular Ca2+ regulation leading to elevated cytosolic Ca2+ concentration could not only interfere with the cellular responses but also activate lytic enzymes such as proteinases and phospholipases. The objective of this article is to discuss the experimental findings that indicates relationship between alterations in cellular signaling and protein metabolic derangements in non-immune cells (skeletal muscle or liver) during sepsis and inflammation.
-
Small-volume resuscitation by means of bolus infusion of hypertonic saline solutions was first applied for the primary treatment of severe hemorrhagic and traumatic shock and promptly restored central hemodynamics and regional organ blood flow. Mechanisms of action are diverse--i. maintenance of high cardiac output (direct myocardial stimulation; increase in intravascular volume); ii. maintenance of peripheral arterial vasodilation (effect of hyperosmolality; plasma volume effect) and iii. reduction of tissue edema (shifting of tissue water along the osmotic gradient). ⋯ Hypertonic volume therapy has been the object of several experimental studies of acute hyperdynamic endotoxemia, however, a greater number of clinical studies have to be developed for the better understanding of the positive, and perhaps hazardous, effects of small-volume resuscitation in sepsis and multiple organ failure. The aim of this paper is to review the concepts involving such solutions, and their potential use in treatment of profound hypovolemia and microcirculatory deterioration associated with sepsis and endotoxic shock.
-
Intensive care medicine · Nov 1995
Multicenter StudyThe Italian SEPSIS study: preliminary results on the incidence and evolution of SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock.
This prospective, multicenter, epidemiological study was carried out in 99 Italian ICUs, distributed throughout the country, from April 1993 to March 1994. In the study, we applied the new ACCP/SCCM classification system for sepsis (SIRS, sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock) and determined the prevalence, incidence, evolution and outcome of these categories in critically ill patients. The preliminary analysis of 1101 patients showed that on admission SIRS accounted for about half of the diagnoses (52%) with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock accounting for 4.5%, 2.1% and 3% of patients, respectively. ⋯ With respect to evolution, the incidence of septic shock was progressively higher in patients admitted with more severe "sepsis-related" diagnoses, while only a trivial difference in rates of incidence was observed between SIRS patients and those admitted without SIRS or any septic disorder (nil). The breakdown of the various ACCP/SCCM "sepsis-related" diagnoses at any time during the study was: SIRS in 58% of the population, sepsis in 16.3%, severe sepsis in 5.5% and septic shock in 6.1%. It seems reasonable to expect from the final evaluation of our study answers to the questions raised by the ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference about the correlations between "sepsis-related" diagnosis, severity score, organ dysfunction score and outcome.