Articles: outcome-assessment-health-care.
-
Critical care medicine · Sep 1992
Comparative StudyFactors related to quality of life 12 months after discharge from an intensive care unit.
To perform an analysis of the quality of life of survivors after ICU discharge. ⋯ Twelve months after discharge from the ICU, a patient's functional status, as measured by the Quality of Life score, is influenced most by age and their Quality of Life score at the time of ICU admission. While there is an overall decrease in the Quality of Life score for survivors, admission and treatment in an ICU do not always result in deterioration of the Quality of Life score. This study indicates that Quality of Life scores could become a routine part of patient evaluation.
-
Flora's Z statistic and standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) as indicators of excess mortality were calculated for a sample of 355 patients with major trauma. A statistically significant overall excess mortality was observed in this sample (Z = 6.77, SMR = 1.81, p less than 0.05). ⋯ Total prehospital time over 60 minutes was associated with a significant increase in excess mortality (p less than 0.001). These results support regionalization of trauma care and failed to show any benefit associated with MD-ALS.
-
To identify patient variables that were significantly associated with outcome in the ICU. ⋯ For patients who remain in the ICU for greater than 72 hrs, events occurring after ICU admission are negatively associated with ICU outcome, more so than ICU admission status as reflected by such indices as APACHE II scores. Iatrogenic complications, often due to inappropriate drug therapy, have a significant association with adverse outcome by multivariate analysis. We suggest that iatrogenic complications influence ICU outcome, and that they are potentially preventable. By lessening their frequency, ICU outcome may be improved.
-
The federal Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 specifies that a state may establish a program to reward--through public recognition, incentive payments, or both--nursing facilities that provide the highest quality care to residents entitled to Medicaid. As state policymakers, providers, and advocates consider development of systems for rewarding quality in nursing homes, including incentive payments based on resident outcomes, theoretical and practical dilemmas must be addressed. The article examines the impetus for combining incentives with outcome measures and the conceptual dilemmas that outcome-based payments pose. Issues basic to successful implementation of incentive payments to nursing homes based on quality of care outcomes are also delineated.