Articles: outcome-assessment-health-care.
-
The federal Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987 specifies that a state may establish a program to reward--through public recognition, incentive payments, or both--nursing facilities that provide the highest quality care to residents entitled to Medicaid. As state policymakers, providers, and advocates consider development of systems for rewarding quality in nursing homes, including incentive payments based on resident outcomes, theoretical and practical dilemmas must be addressed. The article examines the impetus for combining incentives with outcome measures and the conceptual dilemmas that outcome-based payments pose. Issues basic to successful implementation of incentive payments to nursing homes based on quality of care outcomes are also delineated.
-
Meta Analysis
Prearrest predictors of survival following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis.
The success rate of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) varies with the patient population studied. Prearrest variables have been used to identify groups of patients with a particularly low rate of survival following CPR. The purpose of this study was to use the technique of meta-analysis to identify prearrest variables associated with a decreased rate of survival to the time of discharge following CPR of hospitalized patients. ⋯ The identification of prearrest variables that are associated with decreased survival following CPR will assist clinicians when they counsel their patients regarding do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders. In addition, the further refinement of a predictive tool such as the modified Pre-Arrest Morbidity Index can help clinicians to identify patients for whom CPR is futile. Such an instrument must be validated on an independent data set before it can be considered for clinical application.
-
There are many dimensions to outcome measurement for patient care and this study focuses on one aspect of outcome, namely that which is most concerned with the immediate effects of nursing care. Traditionally, outcome studies have been almost exclusively concerned with measuring the clinical outcomes of care with very little attempt being made to assess the effect of the nurses' contributions to that care. One of this study's purposes has been to redress this imbalance. ⋯ These were tested, in a case study situation, on 15 wards at seven acute hospitals. Initial testing indicates that these outcome measures show promise as a valid and reliable evaluation instrument with the utility for easy application in the clinical setting. They are being presented as a possible way forward to assessing the outcomes of nursing care.
-
We discuss some of the challenges facing hospitals in developed nations, with special attention to the need to monitor and evaluate hospital performance. In particular, there is a need for quality indicators that measure the effects of treatment, and are risk-adjusted, so that valid comparisons of outcomes can be made across hospitals that treat different types of patients. ⋯ We discuss the uses of these tools for identifying problems and for monitoring outcomes of care within a hospital, including screening medical records for peer review, identifying variations in outcomes across various subgroups of physicians, and comparing changes in outcomes following various changes in the delivery system. Possible applications at the regional, national and international levels are then discussed, with special emphasis on the use of these tools for measuring the size of the gap between the efficacy of a technology, as determined through randomized controlled trials under stringent protocols, and the effectiveness of the same technology once it is exported, and then used under true practice conditions in another country.
-
Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
The Canadian four-centre study of anaesthetic outcomes: I. Description of methods and populations.
The objectives of this study were first to develop and institute a methodology for the study of anaesthetic outcome for parallel use in four teaching hospitals in Canada and second, to compare rates of morbidity and mortality associated with anaesthesia between the four centres. The basic design of the study was occurrence screening with anaesthetists entering data on patient demographics, anaesthetic and surgical factors. Research nurses reviewed anaesthetic records and hospital charts and interviewed patients postoperatively. ⋯ There were major differences found across the hospitals, particularly with regard to volume, patient case-mix, anaesthetic drugs and monitoring used. The use of parallel training, repeated consultations and use of rounds and inservices contributed to the reliability and validity of the data collection. We conclude that outcome surveillance can be instituted in different hospital Departments of Anaesthesia with sufficient confidence to form the basis of comparison of anaesthetic outcome.