Articles: critical-care.
-
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd · Aug 1991
[Measurement of the quality of care for surgical patients in an intensive care unit in a peripheral hospital].
To determine the quality of care in an intensive care unit. ⋯ The APACHE II score can be used to determine the quality of care in an intensive care unit. Early prediction of a bad prognosis makes transportation to a more specialized hospital possible, before irreversible organ damage develops.
-
Critical care medicine · Aug 1991
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score and outcome in the surgical intensive care unit: an analysis of multiple intervention and outcome variables in 1,238 patients.
To assess the statistical association of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score with multiple intervention and outcome variables in surgical ICU patients. ⋯ The APACHE II score was statistically associated with all the variables examined in our surgical patients, but its predictive power for the individual surgical patient was limited. These findings suggest that the score may be useful for retrospective analyses of large cohorts of patients but should not be used as a triage tool or as a predictor of outcome for the individual patient. Triage decisions should continue to be based on the best available clinical judgment.
-
Advanced age has been proposed as one criterion for limiting the use of life-sustaining medical treatment, but very little is known about current practices. We retrospectively studied utilization rates of intensive care (IC) and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in admissions to a university hospital over 1 year (n = 9,998), to test whether these treatments are used more selectively for elderly patients. Overall utilization rates did not vary by age. ⋯ Despite more selective use, survival rates were lower for elderly than for younger patients receiving IC (88% vs 78%, P less than 0.001). CPR showed similar but non-significant trends. Intensive care is being used less frequently prior to death for elderly patients, based on diagnosis and functional status as well as chronologic age.
-
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther · Aug 1991
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Pneumonia prevention in long-term mechanically ventilated patients: selective skin decontamination according to Stoutenbeek or prevention of colonization according to Unertl? A prospective randomized comparison of both treatments].
In a prospective randomised study, the effects of two different colonisation prophylaxis techniques on colonisation and pulmonary infection were investigated in 40 critically ill patients with long-term ventilatory support (greater than or equal to 4 days). 20 patients were selectively decontaminated with 4 x 100 g polymyxin E, 4 x 80 mg tobramycin and 4 x 500 mg amphotericin B, administered through the gastric tube and with an antimicrobial sticky paste in the oropharynx (group I). 20 patients received 50 mg of polymyxin B and 80 mg of gentamicin dissolved in 10 ml of 0.9% saline at 6 h intervals into nose, oropharynx and stomach as well as 300 mg of amphotericin B in the oropharynx only (group II). All patients received cefotaxime systemically in the first 3 days. In group I gram-negative aerobic bacteria in the pharynx decreased from 35% to 0%, in group II from 40% to 10% and in the rectum from 80% to 61% (10% in the second week) in Group I and from 100% to 73% (33% in the second week) in group II. ⋯ In group I, two patients developed pneumonia and two patients urinary tract infections, in group II two patients suffered from pneumonia and 3 patients urinary tract infections. Both regimes are effective methods of prophylaxis for lowering colonisation with gram-negative aerobic bacteria and the frequency of pneumonia in patients requiring long-term mechanical ventilation. A possible selection of gram-positive bacteria must be appropriately monitored.