Articles: critical-care.
-
Four hundred sixty-one consecutive admissions to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) were evaluated using the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS). Patients requiring an increased level of care, defined as TISS points greater than or equal to 10, accounted for 75% of patient days in the ICU. Within this group, the primary reason for admission to the ICU was congenital heart disease, trauma, malignancy, respiratory failure, and sepsis. ⋯ Assuming that the cost of intensive care is related to both seriousness of illness (assessed by TISS) and length of hospitalization, in this pediatric population the cost of hospitalization was not disproportionately high for nonsurvivors compared to survivors. Reduction in mortality rates in a PICU population will be dependent on factors largely uncontrollable buy ICU practitioners. This will come about by reduction in the numbers of congenital malformations and the prevention of childhood trauma.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Evaluation of neonatal-intensive-care programs.
Within the past 15 years, regional neonatal-intensive-care programs have been introduced and have expanded rapidly. The efficacy of some of the individual interventions that constitute neonatal intensive care has been validated in randomized, controlled clinical trials. It is therefore generally assumed that neonatal-intensive-care programs that incorporate these maneuvers are effective in reducing death and disability. ⋯ Moreover, much of the non-experimental evidence supporting their value is based on the experience of referral units and does not measure the impact on the populations they serve. A definitive economic evaluation of neonatal intensive care has not yet been reported, despite the high cost of such programs. We conclude that neonatal-intensive care programs require further evaluation with rigorous scientific methods.