Articles: emergency-medicine.
-
When weighing the costs and benefits of "choosing wisely," in a healthcare climate that continues to stress cost-saving practices, it is difficult to argue with approaching low-risk patients with conservative approaches and treatments. In defense of liberal and broad approaches to patient workups, however, one must also weigh the bounce-back emergency department (ED) visit, which may represent either a failure of initial evaluation or a success of appropriate return precautions. ⋯ Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the brain and spine demonstrated extensive and multifocal areas of signal abnormalities consistent with active demyelination concerning for acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). Additional lab workup demonstrated seropositive myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibodies, further supporting the diagnosis of ADEM, an immune-mediated disorder which can lead to rapid multifocal neurologic dysfunction.
-
The impact of racism on patient outcomes in Emergency Medicine has been examined but there have been few studies exploring the experiences of racism in health care workers. This survey aims to explore the experience of racism by interdisciplinary staff in a tertiary ED. By characterizing the staff experience of racism in the ED, we hope to inform the design of strategies to disrupt racism and ultimately improve the health and wellness of both staff and patients. ⋯ Racism against interdisciplinary staff working in EDs is common and the burden on healthcare workers is high. Intersections of occupation, race, age and migrant status are uniquely predictive of the experience of racism for EM staff. Interventions to disrupt racism should be informed by intersectional considerations to create a safe working environment and target populations most at risk. ED healthcare workers are willing to take steps to disrupt racism in their workplace and need institutional support to do so.
-
In the management of large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS), patients are frequently evaluated first at a non-endovascular stroke center and later transferred to an endovascular stroke center (ESC) for endovascular treatment (EVT). The door-in-door-out time (DIDO) is frequently used as a benchmark for transferring hospitals though there is no universally accepted nor evidenced-based DIDO time. The goal of this study was to identify factors affecting DIDO times in LVOS patients who ultimately underwent EVT. ⋯ Vascular imaging and non-stroke certified stroke centers were associated with longer DIDO times. Non-ESCs should integrate vascular imaging into their workflow as feasible to reduce DIDO times. Further work examining other details regarding the transfer process such as transfer via ground or air, could help further identify opportunities to improve DIDO times.