Articles: emergency-medicine.
-
Scand J Trauma Resus · Dec 2022
ReviewPreparing medical first responders for crises: a systematic literature review of disaster training programs and their effectiveness.
Adequate training and preparation of medical first responders (MFRs) are essential for an optimal performance in highly demanding situations like disasters (e.g., mass accidents, natural catastrophes). The training needs to be as effective as possible, because precise and effective behavior of MFRs under stress is central for ensuring patients' survival and recovery. This systematic review offers an overview of scientifically evaluated training methods used to prepare MFRs for disasters. It identifies different effectiveness indicators and provides an additional analysis of how and to what extent the innovative training technologies virtual (VR) and mixed reality (MR) are included in disaster training research. ⋯ To determine the success of a training, proper and scientifically sound evaluation is necessary. Of the effectiveness indicators found, performance assessments in simulated scenarios are closest to the target behavior during real disasters. For valid yet inexpensive evaluations, objectively assessible performance measures, such as accuracy, time, and order of actions could be used. However, performance assessments have not been applied often. Furthermore, we found that technology-based training methods represent a promising approach to train many MFRs repeatedly and efficiently. These technologies offer great potential to supplement or partially replace traditional training. Further research is needed on those methods that have been underrepresented, especially serious gaming, immersive VR, and MR.
-
In United States, health care workers have been immersed in the COVID-19 pandemic since February 2020. Since availability of COVID-19 vaccines, there is limited literature investigating the incidence of unknown COVID-19 infections in physicians and Advanced Practitioner Providers (APPs) working in emergency departments (EDs). The primary objective is to determine the incidence unknown COVID-19 infection within a cohort of emergency physicians (EPs) and APPs. ⋯ Unknown previous COVID-19 infection was less then expected in this cohort of EPs/APPs, and no association with individual characteristics, previously infected household member, or children in the home.
-
Healthcare facilities and medical providers are not immune to aggression and threat from terrorists, criminals and rogue states. The concept of Hybrid Warfare is often described as a mix of conventional warfare, irregular warfare, terrorism, criminality and different types of other hybrid threats such as cyberattacks and drone technology. Healthcare systems can either be primary or secondary targets of hybrid warfare with potentially devastating consequences. ⋯ Clinicians and healthcare managers of all levels should have a basic knowledge of the different components of hybrid warfare so as to mitigate effects of an attack. It is suggested that an emergency department do not aim to create totally new solutions for hybrid threats but use an all hazards approach and the available guidelines for handling generic threats. However, there must be a preparedness for the different ways hybrid warfare can play out, how the threats can be combined in synergistic ways and the potential compounding effects on healthcare and society.
-
Despite projections of an oversupply of residency-trained emergency medicine physicians by 2030 and amidst intensifying national debate over Nurse Practitioner (NP) qualifications to practice independently and unsupervised, NPs are increasingly staffing Emergency Departments (EDs) as hospitals seek to contain costs while simultaneously expanding services. We sought to characterize NP practice in the ED by examining NP independent billing by level of severity of illness, and relationship to practice authority, State Medicaid expansion status, and rurality. ⋯ As a proportion of the providers independently billing in the ED, NPs are increasingly managing higher acuity patients as evidenced by billing percentage of the highest acuity CPT codes (99284 and 99285). During the same time period, ED MDs decreased their billing in the same categories. Current employment of NPs in the ED may not be fulfilling its original vision to care for the lower acuity patients in order to allow MDs to care for the more acutely and critically ill patients, and to increase the services for underserved populations in rural areas, those over age 65, and those with limited English language proficiency. Future research should investigate ED policies resulting in NPs as opposed to MDs seeing patients with greater severity codes.