Articles: critical-illness.
-
To examine the attitudes of health care workers regarding the withdrawal of life support. ⋯ While ICU health care workers consistently identify a number of patient factors as important in decisions to withdraw care, there is extreme variability, which may be explained in part by the values of individual health care providers.
-
Retracted Publication
Do plasma levels of circulating soluble adhesion molecules differ between surviving and nonsurviving critically ill patients?
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal). This article has been retracted at the request of the editor In 2018, CHEST published a notice1 that all articles authored by Joachim Boldt be read with caution due to expressions of concern about falsified data. In 2020, CHEST received additional evidence of research misconduct and breaches of scientific integrity that were discovered following an investigation by the author's former institution, the University of Giessen2. ⋯ CHEST 153(3), p. 767. 2. Mukherjee, J. Statement on the scientific credibility of articles published by Joachim Boldt, formerly professor at Justus Liebig University (JLU), Giessen, Germany. https://ars.els-cdn.com/content/image/1-s2.0-S000709122030163X-mmc3.pdf.
-
Intensive care medicine · Mar 1995
Comparative Study Retracted PublicationAlterations in circulating vasoactive substances in the critically ill--a comparison between survivors and non-survivors.
Regulation of circulatory homeostasis is based on several factors including various circulating vasoactive substances. Whether these regulators differ between survivors and non-survivors was investigated in critically ill patients. ⋯ Systemic and regional regulators of the circulation were markedly changed by critical illness. In survivors, these regulators almost normalized within the study period of 5 days, whereas in non-survivors these alterations were even aggravated. It can only be speculated whether these regulator systems were influenced by activation of various mediator systems or whether they themselves influenced the negative outcome in the non-survivors.
-
This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate whether an observation unit (OU) attached to the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary care hospital in India is safe, is effective in minimizing hospitalization of acutely ill patients and is acceptable to the patients. Of 115,916 patients who attended the ED, 11,130 (9.6%) were observed in the OU. ⋯ Twenty-four patients left the hospital against medical advice, and three patients died in the OU. It is concluded that an OU in the ED is safe in treating acutely ill patients, is effective in reducing substantially the number of patients requiring admission to the hospital, and is acceptable to the patients.
-
Se Asian J Trop Med · Mar 1995
Comparative StudyScoring systems for predicting outcomes of critically ill patients in northeastern Thailand.
The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation System (APACHE) III, the APACHE II, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS), and the Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS), calculated within the first 24 hours of admission, were compared in 209 critically ill patients admitted to the regional hospital in northeastern Thailand. Eighty-five (40.7%) patients subsequently died. The nonsurvivors had significantly higher APACHE III, APACHE II, SAPS and TISS scores than the survivors. ⋯ All four scoring system correlated well with the short-term prognosis, ie the mortality outcome, of critically ill patients. APACHE III, APACHE II, SAPS, and TISS appeared to be comparable to predictors of severity of critical illness. Selection of a severity indicator will depend on the resources available.