Articles: anesthetics.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
[Propofol infusion for the maintenance of short-term anesthesia].
The administration of propofol by infusion for maintenance of anesthesia has attracted much attention recently. We investigated the necessary infusion rate of propofol to maintain anesthesia for short surgical procedures without loss of the evident advantages of this substance. Forty unpremedicated female patients aged 18-59, scheduled for minor gynecological procedures, were randomly assigned to four groups. ⋯ After induction, arterial blood pressure decreased by systolic/diastolic 20/10-15 mmHg. With the low infusion rate, arterial pressure increased to its control value during operation; it remained at the postinduction value with high infusion rates. Side-effects: 10 patients had salivation that in some instances lead to coughing, 9 reported pain at the injection site during induction, and 9 reported dreams of a pleasant nature.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
The effects of propofol on cerebrospinal fluid pressure, mean arterial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure and heart rate were studied during induction, tracheal intubation and skin incision in 23 patients scheduled for elective craniotomy. Premedication consisted of midazolam 0.1 mg/kg intramuscularly and metoprolol 1 mg/kg orally. Measurements were made or derived at time zero and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2 and 3 minutes after an induction dose of propofol 1.5 mg/kg. ⋯ Heart rate did not change. Propofol combined with moderate dose of fentanyl, obtunded the usual cerebrospinal fluid and arterial pressure responses to intubation and other noxious stimuli. Thus propofol seems to be a suitable intravenous anaesthetic agent for induction and maintenance in neuroanaesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Pain reduction in local anesthetic administration through pH buffering.
The effects of pH buffering on the pain of administration and efficacy of three local anesthetics (1% lidocaine, 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, and 1% mepivacaine) were investigated in a randomized, prospective, double-blind study of 25 adult volunteers. Plain and buffered solutions of the three local anesthetics were prepared, and a 0.5 intradermal injection of each was administered. Pain of anesthetic infiltration was rated from zero to ten. ⋯ Onset, extent, and duration of skin anesthesia were not statistically altered by pH buffering. The pain of local anesthetic administration can be dramatically reduced by buffering the local anesthetic prior to its infiltration. Anesthetic efficacy is not compromised, and patient acceptance may be significantly increased.
-
J Cardiothorac Anesth · Feb 1988
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialCatecholamine responses to anesthetic induction with fentanyl and sufentanil.
In a randomized study, the authors examined the changes in plasma epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations associated with induction of anesthesia and surgery in 33 patients with good ventricular function undergoing elective coronary artery surgery. After premedication with morphine and scopolamine, patients received either fentanyl, 100 micrograms/kg (n = 16), or sufentanil, 15 micrograms/kg, (n = 17), intravenously (IV), over 10 minutes to induce anesthesia. Metocurine, 0.42 mg/kg, IV, produced muscle relaxation. ⋯ Induction-related changes in arterial pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure were significantly correlated with changes in the logarithm of plasma norepinephrine concentration. Similar degrees of endogenous norepinephrine release appear to accompany induction with equipotent doses of fentanyl and sufentanil in patients premedicated with morphine and scopolamine. Norepinephrine release may influence the hemodynamic response to induction with narcotics.