Articles: anesthetics.
-
A survey was conducted to investigate the attitudes of anaesthetists and nurses to anaesthetic pollution. In order that the results could be viewed in context, attitudes to other possible occupational hazards, including radiation exposure and work-related stress, were also investigated. Four hundred (66%) completed questionnaires were returned. ⋯ Levels of concern were similar for radiation exposure; however, both occupational groups expressed higher levels of concern about work-related stress. Seventeen (21%) anaesthetists and 46 (14%) nurses reported having suffered adverse health effects which they thought were due to anaesthetic pollution. The most frequent complaints were headache and fatigue.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1987
Comparative StudyRates of awakening from anesthesia with I-653, halothane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane: a test of the effect of anesthetic concentration and duration in rats.
The low blood solubility of two new inhaled anesthetics, I-653 (human blood/gas partition coefficient, 0.42) and sevoflurane (0.69), suggested that awakening from these agents should be more rapid than awakening from currently available anesthetics such as isoflurane (1.4) and halothane (2.5). This prediction proved valid in a study of these four agents in rats given 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, or 1.6 MAC for 2.0 hr or 1.6 MAC for 0.5 or 1.0 hr. At a given dose and duration, awakening was most rapid with the least soluble agent and longest with the most soluble agent. For example, recovery of muscle coordination at 1.2 MAC administered for 2 hr required 4.7 +/- 3.0 min (mean +/- SD) with I-653, 14.2 +/- 8.1 min with sevoflurane, 23.2 +/- 7.6 min with isoflurane, and 47.2 +/- 4.7 min with halothane.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Comparative hemodynamic study of anesthesia induction with propofol (Diprivan), thiopental, methohexital, etomidate and midazolam in patients with coronary disease].
In patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the induction of anesthesia is not without risk because of specific cardiovascular effects of the anesthetic and the preoperative state of the patient. The hemodynamic effects of etomidate, midazolam, thiopental, and methohexital are well known: etomidate is an anesthetic that induces only minor cardiovascular changes; its influence on the endocrine system, however, has reduced its clinical indication. Barbiturates such as thiopental and methohexital produce negative inotropic effects in combination with an increase in heart rate and myocardial oxygen consumption; midazolam reduces pre- and afterload in patients with poor left ventricular function. Propofol, a new short-acting induction agent with good anesthetic properties, is said to diminish arterial pressure as well as myocardial oxygen consumption. ⋯ In a randomized study we investigated the hemodynamic effects of intravenous induction with propofol (2 mg/kg body wt.), thiopental (5 mg/kg), methohexital (1 mg/kg), etomidate (0.3 mg/kg), and midazolam (0.15 mg/kg) in 50 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. All patients were premedicated with flunitrazepam (0.03 mg/kg up to 2 mg) and morphine hydrochloride (0.2 mg/kg up to 15 mg) 100 min before the investigation. After 0.003 mg/kg fentanyl the patients received the induction agent in the above-mentioned dosage within 40 s followed by 0.1 mg/kg pancuronium bromide. Hemodynamic measurements were performed 1, 3, and 5 min after the end of the injection as well as 1 and 5 min after intubation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)