Articles: anesthetics.
-
Anesthesia progress · Jul 1984
Comparative StudyComparison of the effectiveness of etidocaine and lidocaine as local anesthetic agents during oral surgery.
In a double-blind study conducted in 112 patients undergoing removal of four impacted third molar teeth, etidocaine hydrochloride 1.5% solution with epinephrine 1:200,000 and lidocaine hydrochloride 2.0% solution with epinephrine 1:100,000 were used, one on each side of the face, to produce inferior alveolar nerve block, infiltration anesthesia of the maxillary tooth and hemostasis of the mucoperiosteum around each tooth. Surgically adequate anesthesia was rapidly produced by both agents but the duration of action of etidocaine was longer than that of lidocaine as reflected in more prolonged numbness of the lip and delayed onset of pain. Moreover, after etidocaine treatment fewer patients reported severe pain as the local anesthesia receded. No adverse local or systemic effects were observed in, or reported by, any of the patients.
-
We treated 72 patients, referred to a pain clinic for acute herpes zoster neuralgia, with local anesthetics administered by nerve block and infiltration. Only those patients with severe pain initially proved to be at risk for the development of chronic postherpetic neuralgia (defined as pain in the involved dermatomes lasting at least six months). Although local anesthetic injections effectively relieved the acute pain of active herpes zoster, they did not prevent the development of chronic postherpetic neuralgia.
-
A 2-month-old infant developed severe methemoglobinemia following topical pharyngeal application of a common benzocaine containing agent ( Cetacaine ). Although a number of reports of this complication have appeared in recent years, this is apparently the first case reported in the Otolaryngology literature. The pathophysiology, pharmacology, and treatment of this condition are reviewed.
-
The new relaxants vecuronium (Norcuron) and atracurium (Tracrium) have been compared with pancuronium (Pavulon) with respect to onset and duration of action and intubating conditions under clinical situations. A variant of the balanced anaesthesia technique with flunitrazepam, fentanyl and N2O/O2 was used. The following doses were considered equipotent (mg/kg body weight): vecuronium 0.07/0.10; atracurium 0.35/0.50; pancuronium 0.08/0.115. ⋯ The early recovery phase (from 5% to 25% recovery) was 6.1 +/- 2.4 after vecuronium, 8.3 +/- 1.7 after atracurium, 17.2 +/- 10.8 after pancuronium. There is a good correlation between our semiquantitative results, using the train of four, and quantitative recordings of muscle contractions reported in the literature. Both drugs show no cumulative effect after five repeated administrations.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. · Jun 1984
Comparative StudyComparison of the effects of Althesin, chloralose-urethane, urethane, and pentobarbital on mammalian physiologic responses.
Physiological responses to anesthetic doses of four chemically dissimilar agents, namely, Althesin, urethane, chloralose-urethane, and pentobarbital sodium were compared in rats. The tail-flick test revealed Althesin had greater antinociceptive potency than urethane, chloralose-urethane, and pentobarbital, but its duration of action was shorter than that of chloralose-urethane. ⋯ It is concluded that Althesin is a suitable anesthetic for short-term surgery and for studies of body temperature, heart rate, and mean arterial pressure. Because release of gonadotropin-releasing hormone into hypophysial portal blood can be observed under Althesin but is suppressed or blocked by chloralose-urethane, urethane, and pentobarbital, Althesin is the anesthetic of choice in studies concerned with the neural control of ovulatory hormone release.