Articles: health.
-
Int J Equity Health · Aug 2011
Gender equality in couples and self-rated health - A survey study evaluating measurements of gender equality and its impact on health.
Men and women have different patterns of health. These differences between the sexes present a challenge to the field of public health. The question why women experience more health problems than men despite their longevity has been discussed extensively, with both social and biological theories being offered as plausible explanations. In this article, we focus on how gender equality in a partnership might be associated with the respondents' perceptions of health. ⋯ Men and women perceive and report gender equality differently. This means that it is necessary not only to be conscious of the methods and measurements used to quantify men's and women's opinions of gender equality, but also to be aware of the implications for health outcomes.
-
I am increasingly bemused by the narrowing and blinkered view of training to becoming a GP. Rosenthal and Chana1 comment 'many trainees still spend part of this time in posts that offer traditional hospital-based experience that may not reflect the context of new community based service models'. Cautiously I would like to add the comment 'so what?' We do want 'well rounded' GPs, people open to new ideas, and who are open to 'lifelong learning.' Many who qualified at a similar time to me will have done hospital jobs as 'part of the team.' Six months at the end of which we were hopefully competent but also confident. ⋯ This also seems to becoming more difficult and not encouraged generally while trying to achieve CCT. That great idea of learner-led education, particularly for trainees, seems to have gone out of the window. I suppose I am saying, can we be a bit more generic in our training years, widen our horizons again, and use First5 to help settle doctors into the rewarding job we do?
-
The bad news is that the BJGP published under such a negative and provocative title without balanced debate, in contrast to the recent BMJ head-to-head debate 'Has child protection become a form of madness'.1,2 One interesting comparison made in that debate is that Sweden and Finland spend 50% more of their gross domestic product on children and families than we do in the UK, we spend 200% more than they do on social problems. In my view these figures help us understand societal attitudes that have knock-on effects through all services for children and families including general practice. The current UK GP contract is certainly not child and family friendly and it is unlikely that current NHS changes will improve matters. ⋯ Those specific to general practice are on pages 60-63 of Working Together to Safeguard Children 2012.5GP colleagues in Cornwall show appreciation of the importance of safeguarding, but many feel there is too much guidance and insufficient resources. The majority of the practices value the RCGP/NSPCC Toolkit for Safeguarding Adults and Young People, that being written for GPs by GPs helps practices establish policies and procedures on safeguarding which work.6 I commend the RCGP for grasping the safeguarding nettle, collaborating with the NSPCC to produce this toolkit, and including safeguarding as one of the ten priorities of the RCGP Child Health Strategy for 2012-15.7 Can the BJGP help the College bring this strategy forward? Up to 25% of our patients are children. They are the future of the UK.
-
There are often many interpretations of patient-centred care. The plethora of information at a patients disposal coupled with current financial strictures, highlights the importance of the concept of patient-centred care and its place in providing evidence based medicine that is cost-effective. Many PCTs and hospitals have and continue to place increasing restrictions in various aspects of health care; screening tests, for example, cervical smear, pathological and radiological investigations, not to mention the proliferation of referral management schemes. ⋯ Now, one could argue that this is whatdoctors should always have been doing. One benefit of the current restrictions is to return doctors to their professional roots and to encourage evaluation of the scope of care with patients. In both these scenarios doctors would be required to address the perennial issue of needs versus wants and their own professionalism.
-
The Urbanization, Poverty, and Health Dynamics research program was designed to generate and provide the evidence base that would help governments, development partners, and other stakeholders understand how the urban slum context affects health outcomes in order to stimulate policy and action for uplifting the wellbeing of slum residents. The program was nested into the Nairobi Urban Health and Demographic Surveillance System, a uniquely rich longitudinal research platform, set up in Korogocho and Viwandani slum settlements in Nairobi city, Kenya. Findings provide rich insights on the context in which slum dwellers live and how poverty and migration status interacts with health issues over the life course. ⋯ While slum populations are highly mobile, about half of the population comprises relatively well doing long-term dwellers who have lived in slum settlements for over 10 years. The poor health outcomes that slum residents exhibit at all stages of the life course are rooted in three key characteristics of slum settlements: poor environmental conditions and infrastructure; limited access to services due to lack of income to pay for treatment and preventive services; and reliance on poor quality and mostly informal and unregulated health services that are not well suited to meeting the unique realities and health needs of slum dwellers. Consequently, policies and programs aimed at improving the wellbeing of slum dwellers should address comprehensively the underlying structural, economic, behavioral, and service-oriented barriers to good health and productive lives among slum residents.