• Ching-Chih Chang, Jiing-Feng Lirng, Pei-Ning Wang, Shuu-Jiun Wang, Chen-Huan Chen, Ling-Yu Yang, William J Huang, and Hui-Chun Huang.
• Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
• J Chin Med Assoc. 2019 Jun 1; 82 (6): 464-468.

BackgroundProblem-based learning (PBL) has been widely adopted in medical education; however, its application has been questioned due to the lack of interaction with a real patient. Standardized patients (SPs) might solve this problem. Herein, we tested the impact of integrating SPs in a PBL tutorial.MethodsIn 2017, a total of 313 students, 66 facilitators, and 36 SPs were enrolled at National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan. The SPs presented the symptoms/signs of the cases then the students interviewed them to obtain the detail history. All students, facilitators, and SPs were invited to complete the questionnaires before and after this program.ResultsMost SPs considered that both the second-year dental medical student and third-year medical students participated actively and were competent enough but students and facilitators considered that the fourth-year medical students might be more prepared. Overall, the students thought highly of the interactions with the SPs. Only about one-fifth felt that this design caused unnecessary pressure among the students and facilitators. They agreed that this program significantly inspired the student's learning motivation (pre- vs post-course: 4.1 ± 0.7 vs 4.3 ± 0.7, p < 0.001), increased their confidence level in interviewing patients (4.0 ± 0.8 vs 4.2 ± 0.7, p < 0.001), and encouraging critical thinking (4.0 ± 0.7 vs 4.2 ± 0.7, p < 0.001).ConclusionThe SPs, facilitators, and students had different viewpoints with regards to integrating SPs in the PBL tutorial. However, a majority agreed that this design enhanced the motivation of students and supported such an application in PBL tutorials.

13 keywords...

hide…