• J Gen Intern Med · Nov 2020

    The Impact of Systematic Depression Screening in Primary Care on Depression Identification and Treatment in a Large Health Care System: A Cohort Study.

    • Elizabeth R Pfoh, Isabel Janmey, Amit Anand, Kathryn A Martinez, Irene Katzan, and Michael B Rothberg.
    • Center for Value-Based Care Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. Pfohe@ccf.org.
    • J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov 1; 35 (11): 3141-3147.

    BackgroundUnless implementation of systematic depression screening is associated with timely treatment, quality measures based on screening are unlikely to improve outcomes.ObjectiveTo assess the impact of integrating systematic depression screening with clinical decision support on depression identification and treatment.DesignRetrospective pre-post study.ParticipantsAdults with a primary care visit within a large integrated health system in 2016 were included. Adults diagnosed with depression in 2015 or prior to their initial primary care visit in 2016 were excluded.InterventionInitiation of systematic screening using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) which began in mid-2016.Main MeasuresDepression diagnosis was based on ICD codes. Treatment was defined as (1) antidepressant prescription, (2) referral, or (3) evaluation by a behavioral health specialist. We used an adjusted linear regression model to identify whether the percentage of visits with a depression diagnosis was different before versus after implementation of systematic screening. An adjusted multilevel regression model was used to evaluate the association between screening and odds of treatment.Key ResultsOur study population included 259,411 patients. After implementation, 59% of patients underwent screening. Three percent scored as having moderate to severe depression. The rate of depression diagnosis increased by 1.2% immediately after systematic screening (from 1.7 to 2.9%). The percent of patients with diagnosed depression who received treatment within 90 days increased from 64% before to 69% after implementation (p < 0.01) and the adjusted odds of treatment increased by 20% after implementation (AOR 1.20, 95% CI 1.12-1.28, p < 0.01).ConclusionsImplementing systematic depression screening within a large health care system led to high rates of screening and increased rates of depression diagnosis and treatment.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…