• Stéphanie Sidorkiewicz, Alexandre Malmartel, Lea Prevost, Henri Partouche, Juliette Pinot, Armelle Grangé-Cabane, Céline Buffel du Vaure, and Serge Gilberg.
• Department of General Medicine, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France stephanie.sidorkiewicz@parisdescartes.fr.
• Ann Fam Med. 2019 Sep 1; 17 (5): 396-402.

PurposeIn this study, we aimed to assess (1) the agreement between patient self-reports and general practitioner (GP) reports of the chronic conditions affecting the patients and (2) the agreement between patients and GPs on health priorities in a primary care setting.MethodPatients were recruited in the Parisian area of France by a convenience sample of GPs; eligibility criteria required that the GP was the patient's listed primary care provider for at least 12 months. Participants were asked to report all the patient's current chronic conditions by using a previously developed list of 124 chronic conditions and write a list of up to 3 priority conditions.ResultsFrom April to May 2017, 233 patients were recruited from 16 GP practices. Agreement between the number of conditions reported by patients and by GPs was moderate (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.59, 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.69). Agreement between patient self-reports and GP reports of each chronic condition ranged from very good (eg, κ = 0.85 for hypothyroidism) to poor (eg, κ = 0.12 for chronic anxiety disorder). Among the 153 patient-GP pairs for which both the patient and GP wrote a priority list, 45 (29.4%) of patients' first priorities did not appear anywhere on the corresponding GPs' lists, and 19 (12.4%) pairs had no matching priority condition.ConclusionsAgreement between patients and their GPs varied widely depending on the diseases reported. Low agreement on health priorities suggests a need for improvement to ensure better alignment between patient and physician perspectives.© 2019 Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

20 keywords...

hide…