• Am J Emerg Med · Jun 2021

    The standardized method and clinical experience may improve the reliability of visually assessed capillary refill time.

    • Koichiro Shinozaki, Lee S Jacobson, Kota Saeki, Naoki Kobayashi, Steve Weisner, Julianne M Falotico, Timmy Li, Junhwan Kim, Joshua W Lampe, and Lance B Becker.
    • The Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, NY, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, North Shore University Hospital, Northwell Health System, Manhasset, NY, USA. Electronic address: shino@gk9.so-net.ne.jp.
    • Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 1; 44: 284-290.

    ObjectiveReliability of capillary refill time (CRT) has been questionable. The purpose of this study was to examine that a standardized method and clinical experience would improve the reliability of CRT.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study in the emergency department (ED). Health care providers (HCPs) performed CRT without instruments (method 1) to classify patients as having normal or abnormal (≤2/>2 s) CRT. An ED attending physician quantitatively measured CRT using a chronograph (standardized visual CRT, method 2). A video camera was mounted on top of the hand tool to obtain a digital recording. The videos were used to calculate CRT via image software (image CRT, method 3) as a criterion standard of methods. Additionally, 9 HCPs reviewed the videos in a separate setting in order to visually assess CRT (video CRT, method 4).ResultsWe enrolled 30 patients in this study. Standardized visual CRT (method 2) identified 10 abnormal patients, while two patients were identified by CRT without instruments (method 1). There was no correlation (κ value, 0.00) between CRT without instruments (method 1) and image CRT (method 3), however the correlation between standardized visual CRT (method 2) and image CRT (method 3) was strong (r = 0.64, p < 0.01). Both intra-observer reliability and correlation coefficient with image CRT (method 3) was higher in video CRT (method 4) by more experienced clinicians.ConclusionsVisual assessment is variable but a standardized method such as using a chronograph and/or clinical experience may aid clinicians to improve the reliability of visually assessed CRT.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.