• British dental journal · Mar 2004

    A study of the incidence of overeruption and occlusal interferences in unopposed posterior teeth.

    • H L Craddock and C C Youngson.
    • Lecturer in Restorative Dentistry, Division of Restorative Dentistry, Leeds Dental Institute, The Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, Leeds LS2 9LU. H.L.Craddock@leeds.ac.uk
    • Br Dent J. 2004 Mar 27; 196 (6): 341-8; discussion 337.

    ObjectivesTo determine the incidence and extent of overeruption in unopposed posterior teeth; to determine the incidence of occlusal interferences associated with unopposed posterior teeth; and to detect an association between the extent of overeruption and the presence of occlusal interference.DesignThe study was a single centre clinical retrospective analysis. Setting The setting was in the Combined Care Clinic of Leeds Dental Institute. The patients were undergoing routine restorative care by final year undergraduate dental students during 2000.Subjects And MethodsAll patients over18 years of age with one or more unopposed posterior tooth, were invited to participate. A sample group of 120 subjects were recruited. A clinical occlusal examination was carried out and the presence of initial retruded contact position (RCP) contacts and excursive interferences were recorded. Study models were made and digitally scanned.Outcome MeasuresMeasurements of overeruption from the curve of Spee were made from the images obtained, by a single observer. Reliability of the measurements was assessed by means of a Bland Altman Plot. The presence and site of RCP contacts and excursive interferences were recorded by a single observer. Reliability of the measurements was assessed by means of Kappa scores. The association between overeruption and the presence of occlusal interference was examined using Spearmans Correlation Coefficient.ResultsA total of 120 subjects were recruited, with a total of 155 unopposed sites. Eighty-one of the sites belonged to male subjects, 74 to female subjects. The mean age of the group was 50.9 years, Standard deviation 13.9 Eighty-three per cent of sites displayed overeruption (95% CI 78-90), ranging from under 0.5 mm to 5.4 mm. The reliability of the observations was found to be good. A total of 51.6% (95% CI 44-60) of unopposed teeth were involved in RCP contacts or excursive interferences. Thirty-two sites were involved in more than one contact or interference. The intra-examiner agreement was found to be good, using Kappa. The findings of the Spearman's correlation, show that if an association exists between overeruption and occlusal interference, it is weak, and of no statistical significance.ConclusionsEighty-three per cent of unopposed teeth are likely to overerupt, and the extent of the overeruption may be marked. The incidence and extent of overeruption is of clinical significance, not only in terms of treatment planning to prevent undesirable vertical movement, but also in the restoration of the edentulous space. The reliability of observations made in the study was found to be good, justifying the methodology. Fifty-one point six per cent of unopposed teeth are likely to be involved in RCP contacts or excursive interferences. The incidence is of clinical significance when planning the restoration of unopposed teeth, or the associated edentulous space. Only a weak statistical association was demonstrated between the degree of overeruption and the presence of occlusal interferences.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.