• Bmc Fam Pract · Jun 2020

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Supporting anticoagulant treatment decision making to optimise stroke prevention in complex patients with atrial fibrillation: a cluster randomised trial.

    • Melina Gattellari, Andrew Hayen, Dominic Y C Leung, Nicholas A Zwar, and WorthingtonJohn MJMDepartment of Neurology, Institute for Clinical Neurosciences, Neuroscience Research, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown (Sydney), New South Wales, 2050, Australia.South Western Sydney.
    • Department of Neurology, Institute for Clinical Neurosciences, Neuroscience Research, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Sydney Local Health District, Camperdown (Sydney), New South Wales, 2050, Australia. melina.gattellari@health.nsw.gov.au.
    • Bmc Fam Pract. 2020 Jun 8; 21 (1): 102.

    BackgroundAnticoagulation for preventing stroke in atrial fibrillation is under-utilised despite evidence supporting its use, resulting in avoidable death and disability. We aimed to evaluate an intervention to improve the uptake of anticoagulation.MethodsWe carried out a national, cluster randomised controlled trial in the Australian primary health care setting. General practitioners received an educational session, delivered via telephone by a medical peer and provided information about their patients selected either because they were not receiving anticoagulation or for whom anticoagulation was considered challenging. General practitioners were randomised to receive feedback from a medical specialist about the cases (expert decisional support) either before or after completing a post-test audit. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reported as receiving oral anticoagulation. A secondary outcome assessed antithrombotic treatment as appropriate against guideline recommendations.ResultsOne hundred and seventy-nine general practitioners participated in the trial, contributing information about 590 cases. At post-test, 152 general practitioners (84.9%) completed data collection on 497 cases (84.2%). A 4.6% (Adjusted Relative Risk = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.86-1.43) difference in the post-test utilization of anticoagulation between groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.42). Sixty-one percent of patients in both groups received appropriate antithrombotic management according to evidence-based guidelines at post-test (Adjusted Relative Risk = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.19) (p = 0.97).ConclusionsSpecialist feed-back in addition to an educational session did not increase the uptake of anticoagulation in patients with AF.Trial RegistrationANZCTRN12611000076976 Retrospectively registered.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.