• Anja Haase-Fielitz, Saban Elitok, Martin Schostak, Martin Ernst, Berend Isermann, Christian Albert, Bernt-Peter Robra, Andreas Kribben, and Michael Haase.
• Department of Cardiology, Brandenburg Heart Center, Immanuel Hospital, Bernau; Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane; Institute of Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Magdeburg University, Magdeburg; Department of Nephrology and Endocrinology, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital, Potsdam; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Magdeburg University Hospital, Magdeburg; Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Ameos Hospital, Schönebeck; Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig; Diaverum Renal Care Center Am Neuen Garten, Potsdam; Faculty of Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University of Magdeburg; Department of Nephrology, Essen University Hospital, Essen.
• Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2020 Apr 24; 117 (17): 289296289-296.

BackgroundIn patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), specialized treatment-initiated in response to an early-warning system- may be beneficial compared with routine treatment.MethodTo explore effect estimators in a pilot trial (DRKS00010530), patients with AKI on regular wards of a university hospital were treated either in the usual way (control group) or more intensively (intervention group). The subjects were allotted randomly to the two treatment groups. The more intensive treatment consisted of an early warning system for a rise in the serum creatinine concentration, immediate consultation of a specialist, and the issuance of a patient kidney passport. The primary endpoint was recovery of renal function after AKI during the index hospitalization. Renal complications and process indicators were the secondary endpoints.ResultsThe proportion of patients whose renal function returned to baseline after AKI was 50% in the intervention group (N = 26) and 42% in the control group (N = 26) (odds ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval [0.5; 4.0], p = 0.58). The calculated glomerular filtration rate went down, from hospital admission to discharge, by 3 mL/min/1.73 m2 (1st-3rd quartile: [6; -20]) in the intervention group and by 13 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the control group (1st-3rd quartile: [0; -25]; p = 0.09). Complications of AKI such as hyperkalemia, pulmonary edema, and renal acidosis were rarer in the intervention group (15% versus 39%; p = 0.03). In the intervention group, compared with the control group, the cause of AKI was identified more frequently (27% versus 4%; p = 0.05); drugs with relevance to the kidney were discontinued more frequently (65% versus 31%; p = 0.01); and the diagnosis of AKI was more frequently documented in the patient's chart (58% versus 37%; p = 0.03).ConclusionSpecialized consultations supported by an early warning system for AKI seem to be beneficial for patients. The findings of this pilot trial should be verified in larger-scale randomized controlled trials.

10 keywords...

hide…