• Eur J Radiol · Jun 2018

    Whole-body diffusion-weighted MR and FDG-PET/CT in Hodgkin Lymphoma: Predictive role before treatment and early assessment after two courses of ABVD.

    • Domenico Albano, Caterina Patti, Domenica Matranga, Roberto Lagalla, Massimo Midiri, and Massimo Galia.
    • Department of Radiology, Di.Bi.Med, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127 Palermo, Italy. Electronic address: albanodomenico@me.com.
    • Eur J Radiol. 2018 Jun 1; 103: 90-98.

    PurposeTo evaluate whether imaging features of pathologic lymph nodes on whole-body diffusion-weighted MR have a predictive role before treatment and may assess the response after two courses of chemotherapy in comparison to FDG-PET/CT in Hodgkin Lymphoma.Materials And MethodsWe reviewed the whole-body MR and FDG-PET/CT performed on 41 patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma before and after two Doxorubicin-Bleomycin-Vinblastine-Dacarbazine (ABVD). Responder and non-responder lesions were identified on interim-FDG-PET/CT performed after two ABVD. We used Multivariate Generalized Estimating Equations model to assess statistical association between being-responder and baseline-Maximum Standard Uptake Value (SUVmax), baseline and interim-Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) and size, ADC and size changes during chemotherapy, site of disease, bulky, and stage.Results10/41 (24%) patients were positive on interim-FDG-PET/CT. The interim-FDG-PET/CT positivity was associated with worse cumulative survival rate at 24 months in comparison to interim-FDG-PET/CT negativity (P < .05); 3/10 patients with positive interim-FDG-PET/CT and 1/31 with negative interim-FDG-PET/CT experienced disease progression. Baseline-SUVmax was 11.18 ± 5.58 (3.1-28.0) and baseline-ADC was 0.70 ± 0.14 × 10-3 mm2/s (0.39-0.98). There was a significant difference between responder and non-responder lesions based on interim-ADC (1.83 ± 0.34 × 10-3 mm2/s vs. 1.01 ± 0.27 × 10-3 mm2/s;p <.001), interim-size (3.1 cm2 vs. 9.4 cm2;p = .009), and bulky (8.2% vs. 66.7%;p = .002). There was no significant difference between responder and non-responder lesions based on baseline-SUVmax (p = .713), baseline-ADC (p = .253), ADC changes (p = .058), size changes (p = .085), site (p = .209), stage (p = .290), baseline-size (p = .064).ConclusionsInterim-ADC is helpful for identifying non-responder lesions, while size changes are not useful. Baseline-SUVmax and ADC have no predictive role. Bulky is the most useful imaging parameter to predict suboptimal response to chemotherapy.Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…