• Zachary Englert, Jeffrey Kinard, Iram Qureshi, Jacob Glaser, and Andrew Hall.
• Center for the Sustainment of Trauma and Readiness Skills, 3635 Vista Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110.
• Mil Med. 2020 Feb 12; 185 (1-2): e35-e37.

IntroductionMilitary combat casualty care is at the forefront of military medical readiness, but there is little data on current proficiency of deployed personnel. A previous study identified a potential performance gap in military trauma teams. This study aims to evaluate a subsequent team to determine if heterogeneity of teams exists and to determine if this level of efficiency persists or can be improved.Materials And MethodsMilitary trauma teams at the Role 3 hospital in Bagram, Afghanistan, were evaluated over the course of a single deployment between April and October 2018. Trauma teams were directly observed and performance of the ATLS primary trauma survey timed. These results were compared to previously published times from Kandahar and Bagram Role 3 sites from Oct 2016 to Apr 2017.ResultsTime to completion of the primary survey in 2018 was statistically faster than the times reported from the Role 3 sites from Oct 2016 to Apr 2017 (344.75 s vs. 482.8 s, p < 0.05). The greatest improvements of efficiency were in the time periods between assessing the airway and breathing, evaluating the patient's circulation, and completing of the primary survey.ConclusionsTrauma teams can vary significantly in their efficiency in evaluating trauma patients. Whether this is clinically significant is currently debatable, but it highlights a possible readiness gap for deploying military personnel and the heterogeneity of military combat casualty care.Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2019. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

11 keywords...

hide…