• Rowan R Sheldon, Woo S Do, Dominic M Forte, Jessica B Weiss, Michael J Derickson, Matthew J Eckert, and Matthew J Martin.
• Department of Surgery, ATTN: MCHJ-SSS-G, Madigan Army Medical Center; 9040 Jackson Avenue, Tacoma, WA 98431.
• Mil Med. 2020 Feb 12; 185 (1-2): 125-130.

IntroductionTension pneumothorax is a common cause of preventable death in trauma. Needle decompression is the traditional first-line intervention but has high failure rates. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and expedience of needle thoracostomy, surgical tube thoracostomy, and Reactor™ thoracostomy - a novel spring-loaded trocar insertion device.Materials And MethodsYorkshire swine underwent controlled thoracic insufflation to create tension pneumothorax physiology for device comparison. Additional experiments were performed by increasing insufflation pressures to achieve pulseless electrical activity. Intervention was randomized to needle thoracostomy (14 gauge), tube thoracostomy (32Fr), or Reactor™ thoracostomy (36Fr). Air leak was simulated throughout intervention with 40-80 mL/kg/min insufflation. Intrathoracic pressure monitoring and hemodynamic parameters were obtained at 1 and 5 minutes.ResultsTension physiology and tension-induced pulseless electrical activity were created in all iterations. Needle thoracostomy (n = 28) was faster at 7.04 ± 3.04 seconds than both Reactor thoracostomy (n = 32), 11.63 ± 5.30 (p < 0.05) and tube thoracostomy (n = 32), 27.06 ± 10.73 (p < 0.01); however, Reactor™ thoracostomy was faster than tube thoracostomy (p < 0.001). Physiological decompression was achieved in all patients treated with Reactor™ and tube thoracostomy, but only 14% of needle thoracostomy. Cardiac recovery to complete physiologic baseline occurred in only 21% (6/28) of those treated with needle thoracostomy whereas Reactor™ or tube thoracostomy demonstrated 88% (28/32) and 94% (30/32) response rates. When combined, needle thoracostomy successfully treated tension pneumothorax in only 4% (1/28) of subjects as compared to 88% (28/32) with Reactor™ thoracostomy and 94% (30/32) with tube thoracostomy (p < 0.01).ConclusionsNeedle thoracostomy provides a rapid intervention for tension pneumothorax, but is associated with unacceptably high failure rates. Reactor™ thoracostomy was effective, expedient, and may provide a useful and technically simpler first-line treatment for tension pneumothorax or tension-induced pulseless electrical activity.Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States 2019. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.

13 keywords...

hide…