• Cheng Li, Hong Zhou, Sen Yang, Xuanchen Zhu, Guochun Zha, Zhi Yang, Feng Yuan, and Weimin Jiang.
• Department of Orthopedics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 899, pinghai road, Suzhou, 215006, Jiangsu Province, China.
• Eur Spine J. 2020 Sep 1; 29 (9): 2368-2377.

PurposeTo evaluate the effect of K-line on posterior single-door decompression with fusion fixation (PFF) and posterior single-door decompression with non-fusion fixation (PNF) for patients with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).MethodsA total of 65 patients with OPLL were analyzed retrospectively. They consisted of 44 patients with positive K-line, designated as the K ( +) group, and 21 patients with negative K-line, designated as K (-). The patients were also divided into a PFF group (38 patients) and a PNF group (27 patients). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, C2-C7 Cobb angle, improvement rate of JOA score, and complications were calculated and statistically analyzed between the groups.ResultsIn the K ( +) group, there were no significant differences in the incidence of C5 nerve root palsy and C2-C7 Cobb angle between the two groups of surgical patients, but there were significant differences in the improvement rate of JOA score and the incidence of axial pain. In the K (-) group, there were no significant differences in the incidence of axial pain, the incidence of C5 nerve root palsy, and preoperative C2-C7 Cobb angle between the two groups, but significant differences were observed in the improvement rate of JOA score and C2-C7 Cobb angle at the last follow-up.ConclusionIn the K ( +) group, the improvement rate of JOA score was higher and the incidence of axial pain was lesser in the PNF group than in the PFF group. In the K (-) group, the improvement rate of JOA score was higher in the PFF group than in the PNF group, and there was significant loss of C2-C7 Cobb angle in the PNF group.

13 keywords...

hide…