• Steven Z Pantilat, Kathleen M Kerr, J Andrew Billings, Kelly A Bruno, and David L O'Riordan.
• Palliative Care Program, University of California, San Francisco, California 94143-0903, USA. stevep@medicine.ucsf.edu
• J Palliat Med. 2012 May 1;15(5):555-60.

BackgroundAlthough hospital palliative care consultation services (PCCS) can improve a variety of clinical and nonclinical outcomes, little is known about how these services are structured.MethodsWe surveyed all 351 acute care hospitals in California to examine the structure and characteristics of those hospitals with PCCS.ResultsWe achieved a 92% response rate. Thirty-one percent (n=107) of hospitals reported having a PCCS. Teams commonly included physicians (87%), social workers (80%), spiritual care professionals (77%), and registered nurses (71%). Nearly all PCCS were available on-site during weekday business hours; 50% were available on-site or by phone in the weekday evenings and 54% were available during weekend daytime hours. The PCCS saw an average of 347 patients annually (median=310, standard deviation [SD]=217), or 258 patients per clinical full-time equivalent (FTE; median=250, SD=150.3). Overall, 60% of consultation services reported they are struggling to cope with the workload. On average, patients were in the hospital 5.9 days (median=5.5, SD=3.3) prior to referral to PCCS, and remained in the hospital for 6 days (median=4, SD=7.9) following the initial consultation. Patient and family meetings were an aspect of the consultation in 74% of cases. Overall, 21% of consultation patients were discharged home with hospice services and 25% died in the hospital.ConclusionsThere is variation in how PCCS in California hospitals are structured and in the ways they engage with patients. Ultimately, linking PCCS characteristics and practices to patient and family outcomes will identify best practices that PCCS can use to maximize quality.

8 keywords...

hide…