• Louise Nelstrop, Jackie Chandler-Oatts, William Bingley, Tony Bleetman, Frank Corr, Jane Cronin-Davis, Donna-Maria Fraher, Phil Hardy, Sophie Jones, Kevin Gournay, Sue Johnston, Stephen Pereira, Peter Pratt, Rick Tucker, and Aki Tsuchiya.
• Royal College of Nursing Institute, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.
• Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2006 Jan 1; 3 (1): 8-18.

AimsThe aim of this review was to assess whether restraint and seclusion are safe and effective interventions for the short-term management of disturbed/violent behaviour. Staff and service user perspectives on the use of these interventions were also considered. The review was undertaken as part of the development process for a national guideline on the short-term management of disturbed/violent behaviour in adult psychiatric inpatient settings and emergency departments in the United Kingdom.MethodAn exhaustive literature search was undertaken. Systematic reviews, before and after studies, as well as qualitative studies were included. Searches were run from 1985 to 2002.FindingsThirty-six eligible studies were identified. However, none were randomised controlled trials. Most of the included studies had many limitations, such as small sample sizes, confounders not adequately accounted for, potential selection bias, poorly reported results, and lack of clarity as to whether mechanical restraints were used. This review must therefore be viewed as a mapping exercise, which illustrates the range and quality of studies that have been undertaken in this area to date.Conclusions And Implications For PracticeInsufficient evidence is available to determine whether seclusion and restraint are safe and/or effective interventions for the short-term management of disturbed/violent behaviour in adult psychiatric inpatient settings. These interventions should therefore be used with caution and only as a last resort once other methods of calming a situation and/or service user have failed.

13 keywords...

hide…