• Neuromodulation · Oct 2004

    Multiple lead spinal cord stimulation for chronic mechanical low back pain: a comparative study with intrathecal opioid drug delivery.

    • Jon H Raphael, Jane L Southall, T Victor Gnanadurai, Gareth J Treharne, and George D Kitas.
    • Neuromodulation. 2004 Oct 1;7(4):260-6.

    AbstractThe objective of this paper is to assess the outcome of implanted multiple thoracolumbar lead spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in mechanical back pain without prior spinal surgery. These results are compared with intrathecal opioid drug delivery (ITDD). An anonymous third party patient questionnaire study of pain relief, function and psychosocial quality of life measures (recorded on 11-point numerical rating scales) for 12 patients with SCS and 13 with ITDD was used. Pain was significantly reduced with multiple lead SCS from a median of 9.0-6.5 (p < 0.01) and with ITDD from a median of 8.5-5.5 (p < 0.01). There was a trend towards greater reduction in pain in the ITDD group compared with the SCS group (pain differences 4.5 and 2.6, respectively) but this did not reach statistical significance. The majority of psychosocial quality of life measures were significantly more improved in the ITDD group compared with the SCS group (p < 0.05). We conclude that multiple-lead SCS improves mechanical back pain in patients unresponsive to more conservative measures. However, ITDD provides significantly more improved quality of life measures, with a trend towards greater pain reduction than SCS.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.