• J Am Board Fam Med · Jan 2020

    Primary Care Physicians' Perspectives on the Ethical Impact of the Electronic Medical Record.

    • Tania Moerenhout, Gary S Fischer, Marlies Saelaert, An De Sutter, Veerle Provoost, and Ignaas Devisch.
    • From the Research Group Philosophy of Medicine and Ethics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium (TM, MS, ID); Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium (TM, VP); Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA (GF); Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium (TM, MS, AD, ID); Bioethics Institute Ghent, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium (VP). Tania.Moerenhout@ugent.be.
    • J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Jan 1; 33 (1): 106-117.

    ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to explore whether specific ethical questions arise with the use of a shared electronic health record (EHR) system, based on the daily experience of primary care physicians (PCPs).MethodsIn this qualitative research project, we conducted 14 in-depth semistructured interviews with PCPs in a tertiary hospital setting.ResultsWe identified 4 themes: 1) PCPs describe the EHR as a medicine with side effects, for which they provide suggestions for improvements; 2) A shared record raises ethical questions related to autonomy and trust; 3) Although use of the EHR often disturbs rapport with the patient, it can also support the patient-doctor interaction when it becomes an active part of the conversation; 4) A shared EHR may cause health care providers (and their relatives) to avoid seeking help for sensitive issues.DiscussionPCPs fear access to results could cause confusion and anxiety in patients, resulting in tensions between autonomy and beneficence. Improved efficiency and quality of care with a shared EHR relies on doctors trusting each other's input to avoid duplicate tests. However, this might compromise a fundamental skeptical attitude in practicing medicine, and we should be aware of a risk of increased confirmation and anchoring bias.ConclusionThe EHR is considered to be a work in progress-EHR design could be improved by examining physicians' coping strategies and implementing their suggestions for improvement. Ethical questions related to autonomy, trust, and the status of records that belong to doctor-patients need to be considered in future research and EHR development.© Copyright 2020 by the American Board of Family Medicine.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.