• Nirmeen Zagzoog and Kesava Kesh Reddy.
• Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: nirmeen.zagzoog@medportal.ca.
• World Neurosurg. 2020 Oct 1; 142: 93-103.

AbstractSurgical brain injury caused by brain retraction is a well-known consequence of intracranial surgery. Modern retractor designs, particularly since the 1980s, have significantly improved ease of use, improved visibility for surgeons, and minimized retraction-induced injuries, though not yet been entirely eliminated. Today, brain retractors come in a broad range of styles, each with its own pros and cons regarding operational utility and patient safety. Which type is chosen for use depends on the surgical approach, lesion size and depth, cost, and surgeon preference. Traditionally, self-retaining brain retractors with moveable arms and 1 or more attachable blades made from malleable stainless steel or silicone rubber have been the tool of choice; however, recently tubular retraction systems that only require fixation to the head frame and cause less focal pressure damage than older retractors have gained in popularity for some cases. This review aims to address the history of brain retraction and discuss each of the commonly used brain retractor types, as well as some newer and less common varieties especially in terms of the extent of tissue damage typically caused as well as the types of injuries reported by the users.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

17 keywords...

hide…